PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1783 (98th)

Antifencing Act of 1983

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 March 1983

Last action

10 March 1983 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Crime.

Sponsors

Rep. Hertel, Dennis M. [D-MI-14], Rep. Minish, Joseph G. [D-NJ-11]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

29 August 2025

Summary

Antifencing Act of 1983 - Amends the Federal criminal code to establish penalties for illegal transactions in precious items, including jewelry and gems. Applies this crime to dealers whose business affects commerce, who purchase precious items from the public, but excludes purchase from wholesalers. Includes as prohibited transactions: (1) purchasing a precious item from a person under the age of 18 or from a person who fails to present identification; (2) failing to keep records or refusing access to records to law enforcement officers; (3) making payment other than by check or other draft; (4) failing to retain the item for seven days; or (5) purchasing an item from a person who is intoxicated or under the influence of a controlled substance. Makes a dealer who commits a violation of this Act, knowing that the item was stolen, embezzled, or converted, civilly liable to the victim of such crime.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on The Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 10 March 1983

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Crime.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.