PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2007 (99th)

A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to limit progress payments under defense contracts.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 April 1985

Last action

16 April 1985 · Committee

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Investigations.

Sponsors

Rep. Kasich, John R. [R-OH-12], JOHN CONYERS, Rep. Weber, Vin [R-MN-2], Rep. Dreier, David [R-CA-33], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Lungren, Daniel E. [R-CA-42], Rep. DioGuardi, Joseph J. [R-NY-20], Rep. Saxton, Jim [R-NJ-13], Richard Durbin, Rep. Porter, John Edward [R-IL-10], Rep. Kolbe, Jim [R-AZ-5], Rep. Eckart, Dennis E. [D-OH-11], Rep. Lightfoot, Jim [R-IA-5], Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD], Rep. Clinger, William F., Jr. [R-PA-23], Marcy Kaptur, Rep. Shumway, Norman D. [R-CA-14]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

6 June 2025

Defence

Summary

Limits progress payments under defense contracts to 80 percent of the total costs of performing the contract (85 percent with a small business). Authorizes the Secretary of Defense and the heads of Federal agencies to provide progress payments at a different rate under certain circumstances.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 April 1985

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 April 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 4 April 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 16 April 1985

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Investigations.

    Source: Committee

  5. 16 April 1985

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.