Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2168 (112th)

GPS Act

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

14 June 2011

Last action

17 May 2012 · Committee

Status

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Sponsors

Rep. Chaffetz, Jason [R-UT-3], Rep. Goodlatte, Bob [R-VA-6], Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4], Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18], Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9], Rep. Farr, Sam [D-CA-20], Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3], Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-12], Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5], Rep. Rohrabacher, Dana [R-CA-48], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1], Rep. Clarke, Hansen [D-MI-13], Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-7], Rep. Latham, Tom [R-IA-3], Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13], Rep. Polis, Jared [D-CO-2], Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28], Rep. Tsongas, Niki [D-MA-3], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Johnson, Timothy V. [R-IL-15], Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA], Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1], Rep. Bishop, Rob [R-UT-1], Rep. Poe, Ted [R-TX-2]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 December 2025

Summary

Geolocational Privacy and Surveillance Act or the GPS Act - Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit intentionally: (1) intercepting geolocation information pertaining to another person; (2) disclosing to any other person such information pertaining to another, knowing that the information was obtained in violation of this Act; (3) using geolocation information, knowing that the information was obtained in violation of this Act; or (4) disclosing to any other person the geolocation information pertaining to another person intercepted by means authorized under this Act, knowing that the information was obtained in connection with a criminal investigation, having obtained or received information in connection with a criminal investigation, with intent to improperly obstruct, impede, or interfere with a duly authorized criminal investigation. Sets penalties for violations. Makes specified exceptions for interceptions involving: (1) information acquired by a provider of covered services (electronic communication service, remote computing service, or geolocation information service) in the normal course of business; (2) federal officers, employees, or agents conducting foreign intelligence surveillance; (3) persons having given prior consent; (4) public information; (5) emergency information; (6) theft; and (7) a warrant. Prohibits: (1) a person providing covered services from intentionally divulging geolocation information pertaining to another person, with exceptions; and (2) the use of such information, and evidence derived from it, as evidence. Authorizes: (1) the use of geolocation information by investigative or law enforcement officers, or by a state's principal prosecuting attorney, to intercept such information under specified emergency circumstances; and (2) the recovery of civil damages by any person whose geolocation information is intercepted, disclosed, or intentionally used in violation of this Act. Modifies the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to require a search warrant to acquire geolocation information. Amends the federal criminal code to include any geolocation information service within the definition of a "covered entity" for purposes of provisions prohibiting obtaining confidential phone records information from such an entity by fraud or related activity. Directs the United States Sentencing Commission to review the federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements applicable to persons convicted of fraud and related activity in connection with obtaining certain confidential phone records information. Prohibits acquiring geolocation information of a person for protective activities or law enforcement or intelligence purposes except pursuant to a warrant issued under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 14 June 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 14 June 2011

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 14 June 2011

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 11 July 2011

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

    Source: Committee

  5. 17 May 2012

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 14 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 14 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 14 June 2011

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.