PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 559 (115th)

MERIT Act of 2017

reportedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

13 January 2017

Last action

17 July 2018 · Committee

Status

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 11.

Sponsors

Barry Loudermilk, Austin Scott, Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6], Andy Barr, Luke Messer, Brian Babin, Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19], Mike Bishop, Michael Burgess, Trent Kelly, Matt Gaetz, Mike Coffman, Dave Brat, Jeb Hensarling, John Ratcliffe, J. Hill, Pete Sessions, STEVE CHABOT, Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10], Scott Tipton, Francis Rooney, Todd Rokita, Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12], Ralph Norman, Stevan Pearce, Alexander Mooney, Warren Davidson, Steve King, Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Mark Walker, Bob Gibbs, Tom Graves, A. Ferguson, Paul Gosar, Neal Dunn, Rob Woodall, Jim Banks, Blaine Luetkemeyer, Bill Posey, JOE BARTON, Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Marsha Blackburn, Garret Graves, Rep. Harris, Andy [R-MD-1], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25], Jody Hice, Tom McClintock

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

11 August 2025

Summary

Modern Employment Reform, Improvement, and Transformation Act of 2017 or the MERIT Act of 2017 This bill establishes an alternative mechanism for the expedited removal by agency heads of federal employees for performance or misconduct by: (1) limiting an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to appeals made not later than 7 days after the date of such removal; and (2) making inapplicable to removals employee protections affording employees at least 30 days advance written notice of the proposed action and a reasonable time to answer the proposal orally and in writing, representation by an attorney, and a written decision. Upon receipt of an appeal, the MSPB shall issue a decision not later than 30 days after the date of the appeal. In any case in which an MSPB judge cannot issue a decision in accordance with such 30-day requirement, the removal is final. The MSPB: (1) shall uphold the decision of the agency head to remove an employee if the decision is supported by substantial evidence; and (2) may not stay any removal unless the basis for the appeal of such removal is related to certain prohibited personnel practices.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 13 January 2017

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 13 January 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 13 January 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 17 July 2018

    Vote

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 11.

    Source: Committee

  5. 17 July 2018

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 62 sponsors and actors.

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.