PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 600 (102nd)

Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1991

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 January 1991

Last action

14 February 1991 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

Sponsors

Rep. Burton, Dan [R-IN-6], Rep. Dornan, Robert K. [R-CA-38]

Subjects

Transport, Aviation

Source updated

26 August 2025

Transport · Aviation

Summary

Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1991 - Amends the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to require the operator of each airport regularly serving an air carrier to use dogs in screening passengers and cargo for the purpose of detecting plastic explosives and other materials which may be used in aircraft piracy and which cannot be detected by metal detectors. Amends the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 to change from discretionary to mandatory the Secretary of Transportation's authority to provide grants for the training and evaluation of dogs for the Explosive Detection K-9 Team Training Program for detecting explosives at airports and aboard aircraft. Requires the Secretary to extend such program to the largest 50 airports, as determined by the number of passenger enplanements in 1990. Authorizes appropriations.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 January 1991

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 23 January 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 23 January 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 14 February 1991

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.