Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6019 (95th)

Federal Employees Freedom of Choice Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

5 April 1977

Last action

5 April 1977 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

Sponsors

Rep. Crane, Philip M. [R-IL-8], Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-13], Sen. Lott, Trent [R-MS], Rep. Mann, James R. [D-SC-4], Rep. Chappell, Bill, Jr. [D-FL-4], Rep. Marriott, David Daniel [R-UT-2], Rep. Rudd, Eldon D. [R-AZ-4], Sen. Symms, Steven D. [R-ID], Rep. Badham, Robert E. [R-CA-40]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 September 2025

Summary

Federal Employee Freedom of Choice Act - Declares that all Federal employees have the right to form, join, and assist a labor organization or to refrain from any such activity without fear of penalty or reprisal. Excludes from the definition of "labor organization," as used in this Act, any organization which: (1) asserts the right to strike against the Federal Government; (2) advocates the overthrow of the constitutional government; or (3) discriminates with regard to race, color, creed, national origin, or sex.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 April 1977

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 5 April 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 5 April 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.