Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 6046 (112th)

Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act of 2012

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

27 June 2012

Last action

19 July 2012 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

Sponsors

Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9], Rep. Filner, Bob [D-CA-51], Rep. Davis, Susan A. [D-CA-53], ROBERT BRADY, Rep. Andrews, Robert E. [D-NJ-1], Rep. Langevin, James R. [D-RI-2], Rep. Larsen, Rick [D-WA-2], Rep. Tsongas, Niki [D-MA-3], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1], Rep. Ryan, Tim [D-OH-13], Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4], Rep. Hanabusa, Colleen [D-HI-1], Rep. Speier, Jackie [D-CA-14], Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-12], Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2], Rep. Hinchey, Maurice D. [D-NY-22], Rep. Miller, George [D-CA-11], Rep. Deutch, Theodore E. [D-FL-22], Rep. Capuano, Michael E. [D-MA-8], Rep. Carnahan, Russ [D-MO-3], Rep. Farr, Sam [D-CA-20], Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5], Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Miller, Brad [D-NC-13], Rep. Honda, Michael M. [D-CA-15], Rep. McDermott, Jim [D-WA-7], Rep. Ackerman, Gary L. [D-NY-5], Rep. Capps, Lois [D-CA-24], Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15], Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18], Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20], Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28], Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

14 August 2025

Defence

Summary

Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act of 2012 - Considers a person a spouse, for purposes of military personnel policies and military and veterans' benefits, if the marriage of the individual is valid in the state in which the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any state, if the marriage is valid in the place in which the marriage was entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a state. Includes as a state the District of Columbia, the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands, and U.S. territories and possessions.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 27 June 2012

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 27 June 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 27 June 2012

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 19 July 2012

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 27 June 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 27 June 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 27 June 2012

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.