Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 7595 (95th)

A bill to amend title 39, United States Code, to prohibit the U.S. Postal Service from merging post office operations without the approval of persons regularly served by such post offices.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 June 1977

Last action

3 June 1977 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

Sponsors

Rep. Lloyd, Marilyn [D-TN-3]

Subjects

Postal service

Source updated

1 August 2024

Postal service

Summary

Prohibits the Postal Service from closing any post office for the purpose of: (1) merging the operation of such post office with the operation of another; (2) changing its name or ZIP code; or (3) reducing its services without the approval of a majority of patrons of such post office who respond to a referendum conducted pursuant to this Act. Requires the postmaster of the affected facility, in the event such change is planned, to distribute a referendum proposing such action to persons regularly served by such post office and to receive responses during the following 60-day period.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 June 1977

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 June 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 June 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.