Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 995 (101st)

Anabolic Steroid Restriction Act of 1989

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

9 February 1989

Last action

22 March 1989 · Committee

Status

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

Sponsors

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Smith, Lawrence [D-FL-16], Rep. Baker, Richard H. [R-LA-6], Rep. McCollum, Bill [R-FL-8], Rep. Dannemeyer, William E. [R-CA-39], Rep. Harris, Claude [D-AL-7], Rep. Scheuer, James H. [D-NY-8], Rep. Miller, George [D-CA-11], Rep. McGrath, Raymond J. [R-NY-5], Rep. Smith, Denny [R-OR-5], Rep. Lewis, Thomas F. [R-FL-12], Rep. Torres, Esteban Edward [D-CA-34], Rep. Schuette, Bill [R-MI-10], Rep. Hughes, William J. [D-NJ-2], Rep. Henry, Paul B. [R-MI-5], Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA], Rep. Flippo, Ronnie G. [D-AL-5], Rep. Mrazek, Robert J. [D-NY-3], Rep. Erdreich, Ben [D-AL-6], Rep. Owens, Major R. [D-NY-11], Rep. Callahan, Sonny [R-AL-1], Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD], Rep. Martinez, Matthew G. [D-CA-31], Rep. Bevill, Tom [D-AL-4], Rep. Atkins, Chester G. [D-MA-5], Rep. Fascell, Dante B. [D-FL-19], Sen. Bunning, Jim [R-KY], Rep. Coble, Howard [R-NC-6], Rep. Robinson, Tommy F. [D-AR-2], Rep. McCurdy, Dave [D-OK-4], Rep. Jones, Ben [D-GA-4], Rep. Dwyer, Bernard J. [D-NJ-6], Rep. McCandless, Alfred A. (Al) [R-CA-44], Del. de Lugo, Ron [D-VI-At Large], Rep. Dornan, Robert K. [R-CA-46], Rep. Lagomarsino, Robert J. [R-CA-19], Rep. Chandler, Rod D. [R-WA-8], Sen. Inhofe, James M. [R-OK], Rep. Collins, Cardiss [D-IL-7], Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R-FL-9], Rep. Hunter, Duncan [R-CA-52], Rep. Meyers, Jan [R-KS-3], Rep. Lehman, Richard H. [D-CA-19], Rep. Packard, Ron [R-CA-48], Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-11], Rep. Grant, Bill [R-FL-2], Rep. Bennett, Charles E. [D-FL-3], Rep. Herger, Wally [R-CA-2]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 August 2025

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Anabolic Steroid Restriction Act of 1989 - Amends the Federal criminal code to provide criminal penalties for knowingly: (1) receiving, depositing, or causing to be deposited or delivered by mail any anabolic steroid or controlled substance for use in humans other than the treatment of disease pursuant to the order of a physician, except as otherwise permitted by law; and (2) using any communication facility in committing, causing, or facilitating a violation of such prohibition. Makes any property involved in a violation of this Act subject to forfeiture.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 February 1989

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 9 February 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 9 February 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 21 March 1989

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.

    Source: Committee

  5. 22 March 1989

    Committee

    Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 9 February 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 143 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.