PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 2002 (110th)

REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007

Original

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 August 2007

Last action

3 August 2007 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Sponsors

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT], Sen. Salazar, Ken [D-CO], Sen. Smith, Gordon H. [R-OR], Sen. Kerry, John F. [D-MA], Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID], Rep. Bunning, Jim [R-KY-4], Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND], Sen. Rockefeller, John D., IV [D-WV], Sen. Landrieu, Mary L. [D-LA], Rep. Roberts, Pat [R-KS-1], Rep. Snowe, Olympia J. [R-ME-2]

Subjects

Healthcare, Taxation

Source updated

5 December 2025

Healthcare · Taxation

Summary

REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 - Amends Internal Revenue Code provisions relating to real estate investment trusts (REITs) to: (1) treat passive foreign exchange gains attributable to overseas real estate investment as qualifying REIT income; (2) increase from 20 to 25% the the maximum value of a REIT's total assets thay may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries; (3) revise safe harbor rules for the excise tax penalty on certain REIT sales activities; (4) treat rental payments made by a health care facility to a REIT as qualifying REIT income; and (5) treat income from, and interests in, foreign-qualified REITs as qualifying REIT income and assets.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 August 2007

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 August 2007

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10931-10932)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 August 2007

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.