PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 2778 (114th)

Directed Energy Weapon Systems Acquisition Act of 2016

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

12 April 2016

Last action

12 April 2016 · Introduced

Status

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors

Martin Heinrich, Rep. Inhofe, James M. [R-OK-1]

Subjects

Defence, Energy, Taxation

Source updated

5 December 2025

Defence · Energy · Taxation

Summary

Directed Energy Weapon Systems Acquisition Act of 2016 This bill amends the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 to state that, if supplies or support services are urgently needed to eliminate a deficiency in directed energy weapon systems, the Department of Defense (DOD) may use specified rapid acquisition procedures to acquire and deploy needed offensive or defensive directed energy weapon systems capabilities, supplies, and associated support services. "Directed energy weapon system" means military action using highly focused sound, electromagnetic, or particle-beam energy to incapacitate, damage, or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, or personnel. The bill redesignates DOD's High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office as the Joint Directed Energy Program Office. The Office shall: (1) develop a strategic plan for development and transition of directed energy weapons capabilities, and (2) use new and revised DOD policies to accelerate the development and transition of directed energy capabilities toward fielding.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 April 2016

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 12 April 2016

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.