Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 356 (114th)

Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2015

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 February 2015

Last action

16 September 2015 · Committee

Status

Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-911.

Sponsors

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT], Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT], Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX], Sen. Moran, Jerry [R-KS], Sen. Gardner, Cory [R-CO], Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH], Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR], Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT], Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE], Sen. Roberts, Pat [R-KS], Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ], Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR], Sen. Franken, Al [D-MN], Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-NM], Sen. Vitter, David [R-LA], Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT], Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX], Sen. Ayotte, Kelly [R-NH], Sen. Heitkamp, Heidi [D-ND], Sen. Udall, Tom [D-NM], Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI], Sen. Heller, Dean [R-NV], Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT], Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA], Sen. Tester, Jon [D-MT], Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO], Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI], Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA], Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2015 Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit a provider of remote computing service or electronic communication service to the public from knowingly divulging to a governmental entity the contents of any communication that is in electronic storage or otherwise maintained by the provider, subject to exceptions. Revises provisions under which the government may require a provider to disclose the contents of such communications. Eliminates the different requirements applicable under current law depending on whether such communications were: (1) stored for fewer than, or more than, 180 days by an electronic communication service; or (2) held by an electronic communication service as opposed to a remote computing service. Requires the government to obtain a warrant from a court before requiring providers to disclose the content of such communications regardless of how long the communication has been held in electronic storage by an electronic communication service or whether the information is sought from an electronic communication service or a remote computing service. Requires a law enforcement agency, within 10 days after receiving the contents of a customer's communication, or a governmental entity, within 3 days, to provide a customer whose communications were disclosed by the provider a copy of the warrant and a notice that such information was requested by, and supplied to, the government entity. Allows the government to request delays of such notifications. Prohibits disclosure requirements that apply to providers from being construed to limit the government's authority to use an administrative or civil discovery subpoena to require: (1) an originator or recipient of an electronic communication to disclose the contents of such communication, or (2) an entity that provides electronic communication services to its employees or agents to disclose the contents of an electronic communication to or from such employee or agent if the communication is on an electronic communications system owned or operated by the entity. Allows the government to apply for an order directing a provider, for a specified period, to refrain from notifying any other person that the provider has been required to disclose communications or records. Requires a Government Accountability Office report regarding disclosures of customer communications and records under provisions: (1) as in effect before the enactment of this bill, and (2) as amended by this bill.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 February 2015

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S773-774)

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 February 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 16 September 2015

    Committee

    Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-911.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 4 February 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 4 February 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 4 February 2015

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.