Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 666 (95th)

A bill to allow Federal employment preference to certain employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and to certain employees of the Indian Health Service, who are not entitled to the benefits of, or who have been adversely affected by the application of, certain Federal laws allowing employment preference to Indians.

failedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

10 February 1977

Last action

26 June 1978 · Vote

Status

Measure failed of passage in House under suspension of rules, roll call #495 (118-204).

Sponsors

Sen. Stevens, Ted [R-AK], Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM], Sen. Hatfield, Mark O. [R-OR], Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND], Sen. Bellmon, Henry L. [R-OK], Sen. Schmitt, Harrison H. [R-NM], Sen. McGovern, George [D-SD], Sen. Abourezk, James [D-SD], Sen. Gravel, Mike [D-AK], Sen. Bartlett, Dewey F. [R-OK], Sen. Melcher, John [D-MT]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Entitles employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the Indian Health Service to an annuity if separated from service after completing 25 years of service or after becoming 50 years of age and completing 20 years of service before December 31, 1989, if such employee is not otherwise entitled to other full retirement benefits and is not an Indian entitled to an employment preference by law.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 February 1977

    Introduced

    Referred to Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 10 February 1977

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 24 January 1978

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on Governmental Affairs with amendment, S. Rept. 95-615.

    Source: Committee

  4. 24 January 1978

    Reported

    Reported to Senate from the Committee on Governmental Affairs with amendment, S. Rept. 95-615.

    Source: Committee

  5. 30 January 1978

    Floor

    Call of calendar in Senate.

    Source: Floor

  6. 30 January 1978

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Measure passed Senate, amended.

    Source: Floor

  7. 21 February 1978

    Introduced

    Referred jointly to House Committees on Post Office and Civil Service; and Interior and Insular Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  8. 13 June 1978

    Reported

    Reported to House from the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service with amendment, H. Rept. 95-1288 (Part I).

    Source: Committee

  9. 13 June 1978

    Reported

    Reported to House from the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service with amendment, H. Rept. 95-1288 (Part I).

    Source: Committee

  10. 26 June 1978

    Vote

    Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: Measure failed of passage in House under suspension of rules, roll call #495 (118-204).

    Source: Floor

  11. 26 June 1978

    Floor

    Measure called up under motion to suspend rules and pass in House.

    Source: Floor

  12. 26 June 1978

    Vote

    Measure failed of passage in House under suspension of rules, roll call #495 (118-204).

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported to House with amendment(s)

    summary · EN · 13 June 1978

    Open at official source

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 10 February 1977

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.