Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 736 (106th)

Freedom From Restraint Act of 1999

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 March 1999

Last action

26 October 1999 · Committee

Status

Committee on Finance. Hearings held.

Sponsors

Sen. Lieberman, Joseph I. [ID-CT], Sen. Dodd, Christopher J. [D-CT], Sen. Harkin, Tom [D-IA], Sen. Inouye, Daniel K. [D-HI], Sen. Robb, Charles S. [D-VA], Sen. Wellstone, Paul D. [D-MN]

Subjects

Healthcare

Source updated

10 February 2026

Healthcare

Summary

Freedom from Restraint Act of 1999 - Amends part D (Miscellaneous) of title XVIII (Medicare) and title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to specify program beneficiaries' rights to freedom from restraint and other abuse while in a psychiatric hospital or other care facility or treatment center. Requires a service provider to report sentinel events (when a program beneficiary under psychiatric care dies unexpectedly or suffers serious injury unrelated to his or her illness or underlying condition) to appropriate agencies or entities with oversight authority. Allows the imposition of restraints: (1) only to ensure physical safety of the individual or others in the provider's care; and (2) only upon the written order of a physician specifying the duration and circumstances under which restraints are to be used (except in emergency circumstances specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services until such an order could reasonably be obtained). Requires the service provider to investigate the sentinel event reported and the appropriate agencies or entities to review and approve the provider's root cause analysis before reporting on the matter to the Secretary for use in the Sentinel Events Database. Directs the Secretary to establish such Database for use on the Internet, with appropriate privacy safeguards for individuals whose treatment is the subject of a report under this Act. Requires additional reporting in certain cases, including: (1) to the Secretary about a provider identified as having a pattern of poor performance; and (2) to the State Attorney General or the appropriate State law enforcement agency in sentinel events involving death. Mandates sanctions for failure to report. Bars disclosure or discovery of a root cause analysis in a civil action.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 March 1999

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 March 1999

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 26 October 1999

    Committee

    Committee on Finance. Hearings held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 25 March 1999

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate (PDF)

    Introduced in Senate · EN · 25 March 1999

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 25 March 1999

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.