PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · S

S. 774 (103rd)

King Holiday and Service Act of 1993

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 April 1993

Last action

13 April 1994 · Committee

Status

Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-1039.

Sponsors

Sen. Wofford, Harris [D-PA], Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ], Sen. Moseley-Braun, Carol [D-IL], Sen. Feinstein, Dianne [D-CA], Sen. Sarbanes, Paul S. [D-MD], Sen. Wellstone, Paul D. [D-MN], Sen. Kerry, John F. [D-MA], Sen. Lieberman, Joseph I. [D-CT], Sen. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick [D-NY], Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA], Sen. Kennedy, Edward M. [D-MA], Sen. Packwood, Bob [R-OR], Sen. Shelby, Richard C. [D-AL], Rep. Simon, Paul [D-IL-24], Sen. Kohl, Herb [D-WI], Sen. Riegle, Donald W., Jr. [D-MI], Sen. Robb, Charles S. [D-VA]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 August 2026

Summary

King Holiday and Service Act of 1993 - Amends Federal law to: (1) authorize appropriations for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission; (2) extend the Commission; and (3) revise its membership. Amends the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to authorize the Commission to make grants to eligible entities to carry out service opportunities on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday. Authorizes appropriations.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 April 1993

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 April 1993

    Introduced

    Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4507-4508)

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 April 1993

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 13 April 1994

    Committee

    Committee on Judiciary. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-1039.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.