PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · SJRES

S.J.Res. 19 (114th)

A joint resolution to express the disfavor of Congress regarding the proposed agreement for cooperation between the United States and the People's Republic of China transmitted to the Congress by the President on April 21, 2015, pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

15 July 2015

Last action

21 July 2015 · Committee

Status

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 154.

Sponsors

Sen. Rubio, Marco [R-FL], Tom Cotton

Subjects

Nuclear energy

Source updated

7 April 2025

Nuclear energy

Summary

States that Congress does not favor the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of China Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy transmitted to Congress by the President on April 21, 2015.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 July 2015

    Introduced

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 15 July 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 21 July 2015

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 154.

    Source: Calendars

  4. 21 July 2015

    Discharge

    Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged pursant to 42 U.S.C. 2159(i) and Section 601(b)(4) of P.L. 94-329. (consideration: CR S5180)

    Source: Discharge

  5. 21 July 2015

    Committee

    Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged pursant to 42 U.S.C. 2159(i) and Section 601(b)(4) of P.L. 94-329.(consideration: CR S5180)

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

5 official files

Placed on Calendar Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.