Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HCONRES

H.Con.Res. 73 (98th)

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States Postal Service should conduct a study of the possible benefits of increased use of Amtrak rail passenger service for the transportation of mail.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 March 1983

Last action

17 March 1983 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization.

Sponsors

Rep. Leland, Mickey [D-TX-18]

Subjects

Postal service

Source updated

6 February 2024

Postal service

Summary

Expresses the sense of Congress that the U.S. Postal Service should conduct a study of the possible benefits of increasing the volume of mail transported by Amtrak rail passenger service. Lists analyses to be made and information to be gathered by such study. Declares that the Postal Service should complete such study as soon as practicable and report its findings to Congress.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 March 1983

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 17 March 1983

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.