PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 934 (111th)

Calling on the Government of the Republic of Korea to end unfair trade practices as such practices relate to the automotive industry, expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that it should take into account such unfair trade practices of the Republic of Korea when the House of Representatives considers the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, and for other purposes.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 November 2009

Last action

19 November 2009 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Rep. Dingell, John D. [D-MI-16], Rep. Schauer, Mark H. [D-MI-7], Rep. Kildee, Dale E. [D-MI-7], Rep. Miller, Candice S. [R-MI-10], Rep. Kagen, Steve [D-WI-8], Rep. Stupak, Bart [D-MI-1], Rep. McCotter, Thaddeus G. [R-MI-11]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 January 2025

Summary

Calls on the Government of the Republic of Korea to end unfair trade practices as they relate to the U.S. automotive industry. Urges the House of Representatives to take such unfair practices into account when it considers the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Demands that such Agreement include the March 7, 2007, Congressional Auto Caucus proposal to ensure fair access by U.S. auto manufacturers to the Republic of Korea's automobile market.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 November 2009

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 19 November 2009

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 19 November 2009

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.