PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SCONRES

S.Con.Res. 109 (97th)

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress that legislation should be passed in order to make the Government Printing Office more cost-effective and efficient.

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

24 June 1982

Last action

20 July 1982 · Committee

Status

Committee on Governmental Affairs requested executive comment from OMB.

Sponsors

Rep. Armstrong, William L. [R-CO-5], Sen. Hawkins, Paula [R-FL], Sen. Thurmond, Strom [R-SC], Sen. Mattingly, Mack [R-GA], Sen. Helms, Jesse [R-NC], Rep. Symms, Steven D. [R-ID-1], Rep. Kasten, Robert W., Jr. [R-WI-9], Sen. East, John P. [R-NC], Sen. Garn, E. J. (Jake) [R-UT]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Expresses the sense of Congress that legislation should be proposed and enacted to: (1) establish parity between the compensation of Government Printing Office (GPO) employees and the compensation of other Federal employees performing similar work; (2) fix the wages of GPO employees in accordance with the prevailing wage rate system applicable to executive branch employees; and (3) strengthen the Public Printer's ability to manage without infringing on the oversight responsibilities of the Joint Committee on Printing.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 June 1982

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 24 June 1982

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 20 July 1982

    Committee

    Committee on Governmental Affairs requested executive comment from OMB.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.