Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Austria · Report · Ausschussbericht

1177 d.B.

Artenhandelsgesetz

ausschussberichtAustria· National Council· DE

Introduced

10 November 2005

Last action

10 November 2005 · Ausschussbericht

Status

Ausschussbericht

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Environment, Energy

Source updated

24 April 2026

Environment · Energy

Summary

Bericht des Umweltausschusses über die Regierungsvorlage (1115 d.B.): Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Artenhandelsgesetz geändert wird

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 September 2005

    Umweltausschuss : Bericht

    Source: stage

  2. 10 September 2005

    Umweltausschuss: Antrag auf Annahme des unveränderten Gesetzesvorschlags Dafür: ÖVP, SPÖ, F, GRÜNE, dagegen: -

    Source: stage

  3. 10 October 2005

    Einlangen im Nationalrat

    Source: stage

  4. 10 November 2005

    Ausschussbericht

    Source: Ausschussbericht

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Berichterstattung

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Berichterstattung

    html · DE

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Berichterstattung

    pdf · DE

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

  • Klaus Wittauer · Umweltausschuss · Berichterstatterin/Berichterstatter

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.