PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Motion · Antrag

16/7032

Creation of adequate pension provision for public sector employees who continued to work after 1990

rejectedGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

7 November 2007

Last action

28 May 2009 · Beratung

Status

Abgelehnt

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 July 2022

Summary

<span><span>Gaps in the transfer of the GDR's pension provision into federal German law: Submission of a bill by June 30, 2008 at the latest regarding pension provision for members of the public service with a GDR biography who continue to be employed without a transition after October 1990, requirements: Application of the Civil Service Pensions Act from October 1990 even if they become civil servants at a later date, closing the pension gap upon admission to the Federal and state pension funds, demand for additional insurance from employers, reversal of the deletion of additional pension claims, regulation of maximum limits only in relation to the maximum of comparable claims West</span><br /> </span>

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 7 November 2007

    Motion

    Creation of adequate pension provision for public sector employees who continued to work after 1990

    Source: BT

  2. 25 April 2008

    Beratung

    Creation of adequate pension provision for public sector employees who continued to work after 1990

    Source: BT

  3. 14 May 2009

    Recommendation and report

    Creation of adequate pension provision for public sector employees who continued to work after 1990

    Source: BT

  4. 28 May 2009

    Beratung

    Creation of adequate pension provision for public sector employees who continued to work after 1990

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.