Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Kleine Anfrage

11/5367

Atomkraftwerk Fessenheim/Elsaß (G-SIG: 11004044)

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

10 October 1989

Last action

7 November 1989 · Antwort

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Energy

Source updated

26 July 2022

Energy

Summary

Ergebnisse des von einer internationalen Expertengruppe im September 1989 der Öffentlichkeit vorgestellten Sicherheitsgutachtens zum KKW Fessenheim, erhebliche Sicherheitsmängel am Reaktorblock I des Kernkraftwerks, Gefährdung der unmittelbar betroffenen südbadischen Bevölkerung, mangelhafte Auslegung der Fessenheimer Anlage gegen Flugzeugabstürze

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 October 1989

    Kleine Anfrage

    Atomkraftwerk Fessenheim/Elsaß (G-SIG: 11004044)

    Source: BT

  2. 7 November 1989

    Antwort

    Atomkraftwerk Fessenheim/Elsaß (G-SIG: 11004044)

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • 11/5535

    Drucksache · DE · 7 November 1989

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 11/5367

    Drucksache · DE · 10 October 1989

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.