Germany · Question · Mündliche Frage
17/1388
Classification of nuclear fusion among renewable energies with the corresponding anchoring in the budget title “Renewable Energy”
Introduced
16 April 2010
Last action
21 April 2010 · Mündliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Energy
Source updated
24 July 2024
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the Federal Government share the view of the German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina, the German Academy of Engineering Sciences acatech and the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, which formulate in the “Concept for an Integrated Energy Research Program for Germany” that nuclear fusion should be equated with renewable energies, and if so, why Isn’t this then logically financed from a common “renewable energy” budget title?
Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
16 April 2010
Mündliche Frage
Classification of nuclear fusion among renewable energies with the corresponding anchoring in the budget title “Renewable Energy”
Source: BT
21 April 2010
Mündliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Classification of nuclear fusion among renewable energies with the corresponding anchoring in the budget title “Renewable Energy”
Source: BT
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/einordnung-der-kernfusion-zu-den-erneuerbaren-energien-mit-der-entsprechenden-ve/25721
- Open data entity: https://search.dip.bundestag.de/api/v1/vorgang/25721
- germany · 25721 · source updated 24 July 2024