Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62010CO0314

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul v Belgian State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgium.#Articles 92(1), 103(1) and the first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Examination of compatibility of national rule both with European Union law and with national Constitution -National legislation requiring preliminary review procedure in case of constitutionality - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Need for a connection with European Union law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.#Case C-314/10.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

22 September 2011

Last action

22 September 2011 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Rule of law, European Union

Source updated

22 September 2011

Rule of law · European Union

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Records

Official record CELEX 62010CO0314 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 22 September 2011. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 22 September 2011

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Sklep Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 22. septembra 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul proti Belgijski državi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgija.#Členi 92(1), 103(1) in 104(3), prvi odstavek, Poslovnika - Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe - Preučitev skladnosti nacionalnega predpisa tako s pravom Unije kot z nacionalno ustavo - Nacionalna ureditev, ki določa prednostni postopek v primeru presoje ustavnosti - Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah - Nujnost navezave na pravo Unije - Očitna nepristojnost Sodišča.#Zadeva C-314/10.

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sklep Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 22. septembra 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul proti Belgijski državi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgija.#Členi 92(1), 103(1) in 104(3), prvi odstavek, Poslovnika - Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe - Preučitev skladnosti nacionalnega predpisa tako s pravom Unije kot z nacionalno ustavo - Nacionalna ureditev, ki določa prednostni postopek v primeru presoje ustavnosti - Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah - Nujnost navezave na pravo Unije - Očitna nepristojnost Sodišča.#Zadeva C-314/10.

    judgment · SL · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Postanowienie Trybunału (piąta izba) z dnia 22 września 2011 r.#Hubert Pagnoul przeciwko państwu belgijskiemu.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgia.#Artykuł 92 § 1, art. 103 § 1 i art. 104 § 3 akapit pierwszy regulaminu postępowania - Odesłanie prejudycjalne - Badanie zgodności przepisu krajowego zarówno z prawem Unii, jak i z konstytucją krajową - Przepisy krajowe przewidujące pierwszeństwo wpadkowej procedury kontroli konstytucyjności - Karta praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej - Niezbędność łącznika z prawem Unii - Oczywisty brak właściwości Trybunału.#Sprawa C-314/10.

    judgment · PL · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • A Bíróság (ötödik tanács) 2011. szeptember 22-i végzése.#Hubert Pagnoul kontra belga állam.#Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgium.#Az eljárási szabályzat 92. cikkének 1. §-a, 103. cikkének 1. §-a és 104. cikke 3. §-ának első bekezdése - Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem - Annak vizsgálata, hogy valamely nemzeti jogi norma megfelel-e mind az uniós jognak, mind a nemzeti alkotmánynak - Az alkotmányossági vizsgálatra irányuló valamely közbenső eljárás elsőbbségi jellegét előíró nemzeti szabályozás - Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája - Az uniós joghoz való kapcsolódás szükségessége - A Bíróság hatáskörének nyilvánvaló hiánya.#C-314/10. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Kendelse afsagt af Domstolens Femte Afdeling den 22. september 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul mod den belgiske stat.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgien.#Artikel 92, stk. 1, artikel 103, stk. 1, og artikel 104, stk. 3, første afsnit, i procesreglementet - præjudiciel forelæggelse - undersøgelse af en national regels overensstemmelse med såvel EU-retten som med den nationale forfatning - national lovgivning, hvorefter der i første række skal foretages en kontrol af forfatningsmæssighed - Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder - krav om tilknytning til EU-retten - Domstolen åbenbart inkompetent.#Sag C-314/10.

    judgment · DA · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Euroopa Kohtu määrus (viies koda), 22. september 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul versus Belgia riik.#Eelotsusetaotlus: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgia.#Kodukorra artikli 92 lõige 1, artikli 103 lõige 1 ja artikli 104 lõike 3 esimene lõik - Eelotsusetaotlus - Siseriikliku õigusnormi nii liidu õigusele kui ka riigi põhiseadusele vastavuse kontrollimine - Siseriiklikud õigusnormid, mis näevad ette põhiseaduslikkuse kontrolli vahemenetluse esmatähtsuse - Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta - Liidu õigusega seotuse nõue - Ilmne Euroopa Kohtu pädevuse puudumine.#Kohtuasi C-314/10.

    judgment · ET · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Ordonanța Curții (camera a cincea) din 22 septembrie 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul împotriva Statului belgian.#Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgia.#Articolul 92 alineatul (1), articolul 103 alineatul (1) și articolul 104 alineatul (3) primul paragraf din Regulamentul de procedură - Trimitere preliminară - Examinarea conformității unei norme naționale atât cu dreptul Uniunii, cât și cu Constituția națională - Reglementare națională care prevede caracterul prioritar al unei proceduri incidente de control al constituționalității - Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene - Necesitatea unei legături cu dreptul Uniunii - Necompetență vădită a Curții.#Cauza C-314/10.

    judgment · RO · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Tiesas rīkojums (piektā palāta) 2011. gada 22.septembrī.#Hubert Pagnoul pret Beļģijas valsti.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Beļģija.#Tiesas Reglamenta 92. panta 1. punkts, 103. panta 1. punkts un 104. panta 3. punkta pirmā daļā - Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu - Pārbaude attiecībā uz valsts tiesību normas atbilstību gan Savienības tiesībām, gan valsts konstitūcijai - Valsts tiesiskais regulējums, kurā procesam, ar kuru tiek uzsākta atbilstības konstitūcijai pārbaude, tiek piešķirts prioritārs raksturs - Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību harta - Nepieciešamība pēc saistības ar Savienības tiesībām - Acīmredzama Tiesas kompetences neesamība.#Lieta C-314/10.

    judgment · LV · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Usnesení Soudního dvora (pátého senátu) ze dne 22. září 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul proti Belgickému státu.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgie.#Článek 92 odst. 1, čl. 103 odst. 1 a čl. 104 odst. 3 první pododstavec jednacího řádu - Řízení o předběžné otázce - Přezkum slučitelnosti vnitrostátního pravidla s právem Unie, jakož i s ústavou daného státu - Vnitrostátní právní úprava stanovující přednostní povahu incidenčního řízení kontroly ústavnosti - Listina základních práv Evropské unie - Nutnost spojitosti s právem Unie - Zjevná nepříslušnost Soudního dvora.#Věc C-314/10.

    judgment · CS · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Quinta Secção) de 22 de Septembro de 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul contra Estado Belga.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Bélgica.#Artigos 92.º, n.º 1, 103.º, n.º 1, e 104.º, n.º 3, primeiro parágrafo, do Regulamento de processo - Reenvio prejudicial - Apreciação da conformidade de uma disposição nacional com o direito da União e com a Constituição nacional - Legislação nacional que prevê o caráter prioritário de um procedimento incidental de fiscalização da constitucionalidade - Carta dos direitos fundamentais da União Europeia - Necessidade de conexão com o direito da União - Incompetência manifesta do Tribunal de Justiça.#Processo C-314/10.

    judgment · PT · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • 2011 m. rugsėjo 22 d. Teisingumo Teismo (penktoji kolegija) nutartis.#Hubert Pagnoul prieš Belgijos valstybę.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgija.#Procedūros reglamento 92 straipsnio 1 dalis, 103 straipsnio 1 dalis ir 104 straipsnio 3 dalies pirma pastraipa - Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą - Nacionalinės teisės normos atitikties tiek Sąjungos teisei, tiek nacionalinei Konstitucijai vertinimas - teisės normos, pagal kurias pirmenybė teikiama konstitucingumo kontrolės "ad hoc" procedūrai - Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartija - Ryšio su Sąjungos teise būtinumas - Akivaizdus Teisingumo Teismo jurisdikcijos nebuvimas.#Byla C-314/10.

    judgment · LT · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Ordinanza della Corte (Quinta Sezione) del 22 settembre 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul contro Stato belga.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgio.#Articoli 92, paragrafo 1, 103, paragrafo 1, e 104, paragrafo 3, primo comma, del regolamento di procedura - Rinvio pregiudiziale - Esame della conformità di una regola nazionale tanto con il diritto dell'Unione quanto con la Costituzione nazionale - Normativa nazionale che dispone il carattere prioritario di una procedura incidentale di controllo di legittimità costituzionale - Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell'Unione europea - Necessità di un collegamento con il diritto dell'Unione - Manifesta incompetenza della Corte.#Causa C-314/10.

    judgment · IT · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (viides jaosto) 22 päivänä syyskuuta 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul vastaan Belgian valtio.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgia.#Työjärjestyksen 92 artiklan 1 kohta, 103 artiklan 1 kohta ja 104 artiklan 3 kohta - Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö - Tutkinta, jossa selvitetään kansallisen säännön yhteensoveltuvuus sekä unionin oikeuden että kansallisen perustuslain kanssa - Kansallinen säännöstö, jossa säädetään perustuslainmukaisuuden valvontaa koskevan erillisen menettelyn etusijasta - Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja - Edellytys liittymäkohdasta unionin oikeuteen - Unionin tuomioistuimen toimivallan selvä puuttuminen.#Asia C-314/10.

    judgment · FI · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Beschluss des Gerichtshofes (Fünfte Kammer) vom 22. September 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul gegen Belgischer Staat.#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgien.#Art. 92 § 1, 103 § 1 und 104 § 3 Abs. 1 der Verfahrensordnung - Vorabentscheidungsersuchen - Prüfung der Vereinbarkeit einer nationalen Rechtsnorm sowohl mit dem Unionsrecht als auch mit der nationalen Verfassung - Nationale Regelung, nach der ein Zwischenverfahren zur Prüfung der Verfassungsmäßigkeit Vorrang hat - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union - Erfordernis einer Anknüpfung an das Unionsrecht - Offensichtliche Unzuständigkeit des Gerichtshofs.#Rechtssache C-314/10.

    judgment · DE · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Rješenje Suda (peto vijeće) od 22. rujna 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul protiv Belgijske države.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgija.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku.#Predmet C-314/10.

    judgment · HR · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Определение на Съда (пети състав) от 22 септември 2011 г.#Hubert Pagnoul срещу Белгийската държава.#Искане за преюдициално заключение: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Белгия.#Член 92, параграф 1, член 103, параграф 1 и член 104, параграф 3, първа алинея от Процедурния правилник - Преюдициално запитване - Проверка за съответствието на национален закон както с правото на Съюза, така и с националната конституция - Национална правна уредба, която осигурява приоритет на инцидентно производство за контрол за конституционосъобразност - Харта на основните права на Европейския съюз - Необходимост от връзка с правото на Съюза - Явна липса на компетентност на Съда.#Дело C-314/10.

    judgment · BG · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (il-Ħames Awla) tat-22 ta' Settembru 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul vs Stat Belġjan.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - il-Belġju.#Artikoli 92(1), 103(1), u l-ewwel subparagrafu tal-Artikolu 104(3) tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura - Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari - Eżami tal-konformità ta' liġi nazzjonali kemm mad-dritt tal-Unjoni kif ukoll mal-Kostituzzjoni nazzjonali - Leġiżlazzjoni nazzjonali li tipprovdi għan-natura prijoritarja ta' proċedura inċidentali ta' stħarriġ ta' kostituzzjonalità - Karta tad-drittijiet fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea - Neċessità ta' rabta mad-dritt tal-Unjoni - Nuqqas manifest ta' ġurisdizzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja.#Kawża C-314/10.

    judgment · MT · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 22 septembre 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul contre État belge.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgique.#Articles 92, paragraphe 1, 103, paragraphe 1, et 104, paragraphe 3, premier alinéa, du règlement de procédure - Renvoi préjudiciel - Examen de la conformité d’une règle nationale tant avec le droit de l’Union qu’avec la Constitution nationale - Réglementation nationale prévoyant le caractère prioritaire d’une procédure incidente de contrôle de constitutionnalité - Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne - Nécessité d’un rattachement au droit de l’Union - Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-314/10.

    judgment · FR · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Domstolens beslut (femte avdelningen) den 22 september 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul mot Belgiska staten.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgien.#Artiklarna 92.1, 103.1 och 104.3 första stycket i rättegångsreglerna - Begäran om förhandsavgörande - Prövning en nationell regels förenlighet med unionsrätten och med landets grundlag - Nationell lagstiftning i vilken det föreskrivs att ett särskilt förfarande för kontroll av en lags förenlighet med grundlagen ska ges förtur - Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna - Krav på anknytning till unionsrätten - Uppenbart att domstolen saknar behörighet.#Mål C-314/10.

    judgment · SV · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Beschikking van het Hof (Vijfde kamer) van 22 september 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul tegen Belgische Staat.#Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - België.#Artikelen 92, lid 1, 103, lid 1, en 104, lid 3, eerste alinea, van Reglement voor de procesvoering - Prejudiciële verwijzing - Onderzoek van overeenstemming van nationaal voorschrift met zowel Unierecht als nationale Grondwet - Nationale regeling die voorziet in voorrang van incidentele procedure voor grondwettigheidstoetsing - Handvest van grondrechten van Europese Unie - Noodzakelijke band met Unierecht - Kennelijke onbevoegdheid van Hof.#Zaak C-314/10.

    judgment · NL · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (piata komora) z 22. septembra 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul proti Belgickému kráľovstvu.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgicko.#Článok 92 ods. 1, článok 103 ods. 1 a článok 104 ods. 3 prvý pododsek rokovacieho poriadku - Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania - Preskúmanie súladu vnútroštátneho pravidla tak s právom Únie, ako aj s vnútroštátnou ústavou - Vnútroštátna právna úprava stanovujúca prednosť incidenčného konania kontroly ústavnosti - Charta základných práv Európskej únie - Potreba spojitosti s právom Únie - Zjavný nedostatok právomoci Súdneho dvora.#Vec C-314/10.

    judgment · SK · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Quinta) de 22 de septiembre de 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul contra Estado belga.#Petición de decisión prejudicial: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Bélgica.#Artículos 92, apartado 1, 103, apartado 1, y 104, apartado 3, párrafo primero, del Reglamento de Procedimiento - Remisión prejudicial - Examen de la conformidad de una regla nacional tanto con el Derecho de la Unión como con la Constitución nacional - Normativa nacional que prevé el carácter prioritario de un procedimiento incidental de control de constitucionalidad - Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea - Necesidad de conexión con el Derecho de la Unión - Incompetencia manifiesta del Tribunal de Justicia.#Asunto C-314/10.

    judgment · ES · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (πέμπτο τμήμα) της 22ας Σεπτεμβρίου 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul κατά Βελγικού Δημοσίου.#Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Βέλγιο.#Άρθρα 92, παράγραφος 1, 103, παράγραφος 1, και 104, παράγραφος 3, πρώτο εδάφιο, του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας - Αίτηση εκδόσεως προδικαστικής αποφάσεως - Εξέταση του συμβατού εθνικού κανόνα τόσο με το δίκαιο της Ένωσης όσο και με το εθνικό Σύνταγμα - Εθνική ρύθμιση προβλέπουσα την κατά προτεραιότητα εφαρμογή προκριματικής διαδικασίας ελέγχου της συνταγματικότητας - Χάρτης των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης - Ανάγκη υπάρξεως συνδετικού στοιχείου με το δίκαιο της Ένωσης - Πρόδηλη έλλειψη αρμοδιότητας του Δικαστηρίου.#Υπόθεση C-314/10.

    judgment · EL · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2011.#Hubert Pagnoul v Belgian State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de première instance de Liège - Belgium.#Articles 92(1), 103(1) and the first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Examination of compatibility of national rule both with European Union law and with national Constitution -National legislation requiring preliminary review procedure in case of constitutionality - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Need for a connection with European Union law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.#Case C-314/10.

    judgment · EN · 22 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.