European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62019CJ0057
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Tempus Energy Ltd and Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 4(3) and (4) – Concept of ‘doubts as to the compatibility of a notified measure with the common market’ – Decision not to raise objections – Formal investigation procedure not initiated – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Code of Best Practice for the conduct of State aid control procedures – ‘Pre-notification’ contacts – Procedural rights of interested parties – Electricity capacity market in the United Kingdom.#Case C-57/19 P.
Introduced
2 September 2021
Last action
2 September 2021 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Environment, Energy
Source updated
2 September 2021
Records
Official record CELEX 62019CJ0057 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 September 2021. Status: decided.
Timeline
2 September 2021
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Domstolens dom (fjärde avdelningen) av den 2 september 2021.#Europeiska kommissionen mot Tempus Energy Ltd och Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Överklagande – Statligt stöd – Stödordning – Artikel 108.2 och 108.3 FEUF – Förordning (EG) nr 659/1999 – Artikel 4.3 och 4.4 – Begreppet ’tveksamhet i fråga om en anmäld åtgärds förenlighet med den gemensamma marknaden’ – Beslut om att inte göra invändningar – Det formella granskningsförfarandet har inte inletts – Riktlinjer för statligt stöd till miljöskydd och energi för 2014 – 2020 – Regler om bästa praxis vid kontroll av statligt stöd – Kontakter ’före anmälan’ – De berörda parternas processuella rättigheter – Elkapacitetsmarknaden i Förenade kungariket.#Mål C-57/19 P.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (fjärde avdelningen) av den 2 september 2021.#Europeiska kommissionen mot Tempus Energy Ltd och Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Överklagande – Statligt stöd – Stödordning – Artikel 108.2 och 108.3 FEUF – Förordning (EG) nr 659/1999 – Artikel 4.3 och 4.4 – Begreppet ’tveksamhet i fråga om en anmäld åtgärds förenlighet med den gemensamma marknaden’ – Beslut om att inte göra invändningar – Det formella granskningsförfarandet har inte inletts – Riktlinjer för statligt stöd till miljöskydd och energi för 2014 – 2020 – Regler om bästa praxis vid kontroll av statligt stöd – Kontakter ’före anmälan’ – De berörda parternas processuella rättigheter – Elkapacitetsmarknaden i Förenade kungariket.#Mål C-57/19 P.
judgment · SV · 2 September 2021
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a patra) din 2 septembrie 2021.#Comisia Europeană împotriva Tempus Energy Ltd și a Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Recurs – Ajutoare de stat – Schemă de ajutor – Articolul 108 alineatele (2) și (3) TFUE – Regulamentul (CE) nr. 659/1999 – Articolul 4 alineatele (3) și (4) – Noțiunea de „îndoieli cu privire la compatibilitatea unei măsuri notificate cu piața comună” – Decizie de a nu ridica obiecții – Neinițierea procedurii oficiale de investigare – Orientări privind ajutoarele de stat pentru protecția mediului și energie pentru perioada 2014-2020 – Codul celor mai bune practici de desfășurare a procedurilor de control al ajutoarelor de stat – Contacte „prealabile notificării” – Drepturi procedurale ale părților interesate – Piața de capacități de energie electrică din Regatul Unit.#Cauza C-57/19 P.
judgment · RO · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Quarta Secção) de 2 de setembro de 2021.#Comissão Europeia contra Tempus Energy Ltd e Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Recurso de decisão do Tribunal Geral — Auxílios de Estado — Regime de auxílio — Artigo 108.o, n.os 2 e 3, TFUE — Regulamento (CE) n.o 659/1999 — Artigo 4.o, n.os 3 e 4 — Conceito de “dúvidas quanto à compatibilidade de uma medida notificada com o mercado comum” — Decisão de não levantar objeções — Procedimento formal de investigação não iniciado — Orientações relativas aos auxílios estatais à proteção ambiental e à energia 2014‑2020 — Código de boas práticas para a condução dos procedimentos de controlo dos auxílios estatais — Contactos de “pré‑notificação” — Direitos processuais das partes interessadas — Mercado de capacidade de eletricidade no Reino Unido.#Processo C-57/19 P.
judgment · PT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 2 september 2021.#Europese Commissie tegen Tempus Energy Ltd en Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Hogere voorziening – Staatssteun – Steunregeling – Artikel 108, leden 2 en 3, VWEU – Verordening (EG) nr. 659/1999 – Artikel 4, leden 3 en 4 – Begrip ‚twijfel over de verenigbaarheid van een aangemelde maatregel met de gemeenschappelijke markt’ – Besluit om geen bezwaar te maken – Geen inleiding van de formele onderzoeksprocedure – Richtsnoeren staatssteun ten behoeve van milieubescherming en energie 2014‑2020 – Gedragscode voor een goed verloop van de staatssteunprocedures – Contacten ‚voorafgaand aan de aanmelding’ – Procedurele rechten van de belanghebbenden – Elektriciteitscapaciteitsmarkt in het Verenigd Koninkrijk.#Zaak C-57/19 P.
judgment · NL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Ir-Raba' Awla) tat-2 ta’ Settembru 2021.#Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea vs Tempus Energy Ltd u Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Appell – Għajnuna mill-Istat – Skema ta’ għajnuna – Artikolu 108(2) u (3) TFUE – Regolament (KE) Nru 659/1999 – Artikolu 4(3) u (4) – Kunċett ta’ ‘dubji rigward il-kompatibbiltà ta’ miżura nnotifikata mas-suq komuni’ – Deċiżjoni li ma jitqajmux oġġezzjonijiet – Assenza ta’ ftuħ tal-proċedura ta’ investigazzjoni formali – Linji gwida li jikkonċernaw l-għajnuna mill-Istat għall-protezzjoni tal-ambjent u għall-enerġija għall-perijodu 2014-2020 – Kodiċi tal-Aħjar Prattika għat-tmexxija tal-proċeduri ta’ kontroll tal-għajnuna mill-Istat – Kuntatti ta’ ‘qabel in-notifika’ – Drittijiet proċedurali tal-partijiet interessati – Suq tal-kapaċità tal-elettriku fir-Renju Unit.#Kawża C-57/19 P.
judgment · MT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (ceturtā palāta), 2021. gada 2. septembris.#Eiropas Komisija pret Tempus Energy Ltd un Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Apelācija – Valsts atbalsts – Atbalsta shēma – LESD 108. panta 2. un 3. punkts – Regula (EK) Nr. 659/1999 – 4. panta 3. un 4. punkts – Jēdziens “šaubas par paziņotā pasākuma saderību ar kopējo tirgu” – Lēmums necelt iebildumus – Formālas izmeklēšanas procedūras nesākšana – Pamatnostādnes par valsts atbalstu vides aizsardzībai un enerģētikai 2014. – 2020. gadam – Paraugprakses kodekss par valsts atbalsta pārbaudes procedūru – Saziņa “pirms paziņošanas” – Ieinteresēto personu procesuālās tiesības – Elektroenerģijas jaudas tirgus Apvienotajā Karalistē.#Lieta C-57/19 P.
judgment · LV · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2021 m. rugsėjo 2 d. Teisingumo Teismo (ketvirtoji kolegija) sprendimas.#Europos Komisija prieš Tempus Energy Ltd ir Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Apeliacinis skundas – Valstybės pagalba – Pagalbos schema – SESV 108 straipsnio 2 ir 3 dalys – Reglamentas (EB) Nr. 659/1999 – 4 straipsnio 3 ir 4 dalys – Sąvoka „abejonės dėl pranešime nurodytos priemonės suderinamumo su bendrąja rinka“ – Sprendimas nereikšti prieštaravimų – Formalios tyrimo procedūros nepradėjimas – 2014 – 2020 m. Valstybės pagalbos aplinkos apsaugai ir energetikai gairės – Geriausios praktikos vykdant valstybės pagalbos kontrolės procedūras kodeksas – Bendravimas „per etapą iki pranešimo“ – Suinteresuotųjų šalių procesinės teisės – Elektros energijos pajėgumų pirkimas Jungtinėje Karalystėje.#Byla C-57/19 P.
judgment · LT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (negyedik tanács), 2021. szeptember 2.#Európai Bizottság kontra Tempus Energy Ltd és Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Fellebbezés – Állami támogatások – Támogatási rendszer – Az EUMSZ 108. cikk (2) és (3) bekezdése – 659/1999/EK rendelet – A 4. cikk (3) és (4) bekezdése – A » bejelentett intézkedés közös piaccal való összeegyeztethetőségével kapcsolatos kétségek« fogalma – Kifogást nem emelő határozat – A hivatalos vizsgálati eljárás megindításának hiánya – A 2014 és 2020 közötti időszakban nyújtott környezetvédelmi és energetikai állami támogatásokról szóló iránymutatás – Az állami támogatások ellenőrzési eljárásainak lefolytatására alkalmazott bevált gyakorlatok kódexe – A »bejelentést megelőző« kapcsolatfelvétel – Az érdekelt felek eljárási jogai – Az Egyesült Királyság kapacitáspiaca.#C-57/19. P. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (četvrto vijeće) od 2. rujna 2021.#Europska komisija protiv Tempus Energy Ltd i Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Žalba – Državne potpore – Program potpore – Članak 108. stavci 2. i 3. UFEU‑a – Uredba (EZ) br. 659/1999 – Članak 4. stavci 3. i 4. – Pojam ,sumnje u pogledu sukladnosti prijavljene mjere s načelima zajedničkog tržišta’ – Odluka o neospornosti – Nepokretanje formalnog istražnog postupka – Smjernice o državnim potporama za zaštitu okoliša i energiju za razdoblje 2014. – 2020. – Kodeks najbolje prakse za provedbu postupaka nadzora državnih potpora – Kontakti koji ,prethode prijavi’ – Postupovna prava zainteresiranih stranaka – Tržište kapaciteta električnom energijom u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini.#Predmet C-57/19 P.
judgment · HR · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (neljas koda), 2.9.2021.#Euroopa Komisjon versus Tempus Energy Ltd ja Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Apellatsioonkaebus – Riigiabi – Abikava – ELTL artikli 108 lõiked 2 ja 3 – Määrus (EÜ) nr 659/1999 – Artikli 4 lõiked 3 ja 4 – Mõiste „kahtlus teatatud meetme ühisturuga kokkusobivuse kohta“ – Otsus jätta vastuväited esitamata – Ametliku uurimismenetluse algatamata jätmine – Keskkonna- ja energiaalase riigiabi suunised aastateks 2014-2020 – Parimate tavade juhend riigiabi kontrollimenetluste teostamiseks – Teatise esitamisele eelnevad kontaktid – Huvitatud isikute menetlusõigused – Ühendkuningriigi elektrivõimsuse turg.#Kohtuasi C-57/19 P.
judgment · ET · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τέταρτο τμήμα) της 2ας Σεπτεμβρίου 2021.#Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή κατά Tempus Energy Ltd και Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Αίτηση αναιρέσεως – Κρατικές ενισχύσεις – Καθεστώς ενίσχυσης – Άρθρο 108, παράγραφοι 2 και 3, ΣΛΕΕ – Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 659/1999 – Άρθρο 4, παράγραφοι 3 και 4 – Έννοια της φράσης “αμφιβολίες κατά πόσον το κοινοποιηθέν μέτρο συμβιβάζεται με την κοινή αγορά” – Απόφαση για τη μη διατύπωση αντιρρήσεων – Μη κίνηση της επίσημης διαδικασίας έρευνας – Κατευθυντήριες γραμμές για τις κρατικές ενισχύσεις στους τομείς του περιβάλλοντος και της ενέργειας (2014‑2020) – Κώδικας βέλτιστων πρακτικών για τη διεξαγωγή διαδικασιών που αφορούν τον έλεγχο των κρατικών ενισχύσεων – Επαφές “προ της κοινοποίησης” – Διαδικαστικά δικαιώματα των ενδιαφερόμενων μερών – Αγορά επάρκειας ηλεκτρικής ισχύος στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.#Υπόθεση C-57/19 P.
judgment · EL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 2. September 2021.#Europäische Kommission gegen Tempus Energy Ltd und Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Rechtsmittel – Staatliche Beihilfen – Beihilferegelung – Art. 108 Abs. 2 und 3 AEUV – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 659/1999 – Art. 4 Abs. 3 und 4 – Begriff ‚Bedenken hinsichtlich der Vereinbarkeit einer angemeldeten Maßnahme mit dem Gemeinsamen Markt‘ – Entscheidung, keine Einwände zu erheben – Keine Eröffnung des förmlichen Prüfverfahrens – Leitlinien für staatliche Umweltschutz- und Energiebeihilfen 2014‑2020 – Verhaltenskodex für die Durchführung von Beihilfeverfahren – ‚Vorabkontakte‘ – Verfahrensrechte der Beteiligten – Kapazitätsmarkt im Vereinigten Königreich.#Rechtssache C-57/19 P.
judgment · DE · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 2. september 2021.#Europa-Kommissionen mod Tempus Energy Ltd og Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Appel – statsstøtte – støtteordning – artikel 108, stk. 2 og 3, TEUF – forordning (EF) nr. 659/1999 – artikel 4, stk. 3 og 4 – begrebet »tvivl om den anmeldte foranstaltnings forenelighed med det indre marked« – afgørelse om ikke at gøre indsigelser – manglende indledning af den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure – retningslinjer for statsstøtte til miljøbeskyttelse og energi 2014/2020 – kodeks for god praksis ved behandling af statsstøttesager – kontakter forud for »anmeldelsen« – de interesserede parters processuelle rettigheder – el-kapacitetsmarkedet i Det Forenede Kongerige.#Sag C-57/19 P.
judgment · DA · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 2. září 2021.#Evropská komise v. Tempus Energy Ltd a Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Kasační opravný prostředek – Státní podpory – Režim podpory – Článek 108 odst. 2 a 3 SFEU – Nařízení (ES) č. 659/1999 – Článek 4 odst. 3 a 4 – Pojem ‚pochybnosti o slučitelnosti oznámeného opatření se společným trhem‘ – Rozhodnutí nevznášet námitky – Nezahájení formálního vyšetřovacího řízení – Pokyny pro státní podporu v oblasti životního prostředí a energetiky na období 2014 – 2020 – Kodex osvědčených postupů pro provádění řízení ve věcech kontroly státní podpory – Kontakty ‚před oznámením‘ – Procesní práva zúčastněných stran – Kapacitní trh s elektřinou ve Spojeném království.#Věc C-57/19 P.
judgment · CS · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 2 de septiembre de 2021.#Comisión Europea contra Tempus Energy Ltd y Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Recurso de casación — Ayudas de Estado — Régimen de ayudas — Artículo 108 TFUE, apartados 2 y 3 — Reglamento (CE) n.o 659/1999 — Artículo 4, apartados 3 y 4 — Concepto de “dudas en cuanto a la compatibilidad de una medida notificada con el mercado común” — Decisión de no formular objeciones — No incoación de un procedimiento de investigación formal — Directrices sobre ayudas estatales en materia de protección del medio ambiente y energía 2014‑2020 — Código de buenas prácticas para los procedimientos de control de las ayudas estatales — Contactos “previos a la notificación” — Derechos procesales de las partes interesadas — Mercado de capacidad de electricidad en el Reino Unido.#Asunto C-57/19 P.
judgment · ES · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (neljäs jaosto) 2.9.2021.#Euroopan komissio vastaan Tempus Energy Ltd ja Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Muutoksenhaku – Valtiontuet – Tukijärjestelmä – SEUT 108 artiklan 2 ja 3 kohta – Asetus (EY) N:o 659/1999 – 4 artiklan 3 ja 4 kohta – Epäilyjä ilmoitetun toimenpiteen yhteensopivuudesta yhteismarkkinoille koskeva käsite – Vastustamatta jättämistä koskeva päätös – Muodollisen tutkintamenettelyn aloittamatta jättäminen – Valtiontukea ympäristönsuojelulle ja energia-alalle vuosina 2014 – 2020 koskevat suuntaviivat – Valtiontuen tarkastusmenettelyissä sovellettavat käytännesäännöt – Ilmoitusta edeltävä yhteydenpito – Asianomaisten osapuolten menettelylliset oikeudet – Sähkökapasiteettimarkkinat Yhdistyneessä kuningaskunnassa.#Asia C-57/19 P.
judgment · FI · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (štvrtá komora) z 2. septembra 2021.#Európska komisia proti Tempus Energy Ltd a Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Odvolanie – Štátna pomoc – Schéma pomoci – Článok 108 ods. 2 a 3 ZFEÚ – Nariadenie (ES) č. 659/1999 – Článok 4 ods. 3 a 4 – Pojem ‚pochybnosti o zlučiteľnosti oznamovaného opatrenia so spoločným trhom‘ – Rozhodnutie o nevznesení námietok – Nezačatie konania vo veci formálneho zisťovania – Usmernenie o štátnej pomoci v oblasti ochrany životného prostredia a energetiky na roky 2014 – 2020 – Kódex najlepšej praxe pre uskutočňovanie konaní vo veci kontroly štátnej pomoci – Kontakty ‚pred oznámením opatrenia‘ – Procesné práva dotknutých osôb – Trh s kapacitou elektrickej energie v Spojenom kráľovstve.#Vec C-57/19 P.
judgment · SK · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 2 września 2021 r.#Komisja Europejska przeciwko Tempus Energy Ltd i Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Odwołanie – Pomoc państwa – System pomocy – Artykuł 108 ust. 2 i 3 TFUE – Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 659/1999 – Artykuł 4 ust. 3 i 4 – Pojęcie „wątpliwości co do zgodności środka będącego przedmiotem zgłoszenia ze wspólnym rynkiem” – Decyzja o niewnoszeniu zastrzeżeń – Brak wszczęcia formalnego postępowania wyjaśniającego – Wytyczne w sprawie pomocy państwa na ochronę środowiska i cele związane z energią w latach 2014 – 2020 – Kodeks najlepszych praktyk dotyczących przebiegu postępowania w zakresie kontroli pomocy państwa – Kontakty „przedzgłoszeniowe” – Prawa proceduralne zainteresowanych stron – Rynek mocy wytwórczej energii elektrycznej w Zjednoczonym Królestwie.#Sprawa C-57/19 P.
judgment · PL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 2. septembra 2021.#Evropska komisija proti Tempus Energy Ltd in Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Pritožba – Državne pomoči – Shema pomoči – Člen 108(2) in (3) PDEU – Uredba (ES) št. 659/1999 – Člen 4(3) in (4) – Pojem ,dvomi o združljivosti prijavljenega ukrepa s skupnim trgom‘ – Sklep o nenasprotovanju – Neobstoj začetka formalnega postopka preiskave – Smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja in energijo za obdobje 2014 – 2020 – Kodeks najboljših praks pri izvajanju postopkov za nadzor državnih pomoči – Stiki ,pred priglasitvijo‘ – Procesne pravice zainteresiranih strank – Trg zmogljivosti električne energije v Združenem kraljestvu.#Zadeva C-57/19 P.
judgment · SL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Quarta Sezione) del 2 settembre 2021.#Commissione europea contro Tempus Energy Ltd e Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Impugnazione – Aiuti di Stato – Regime di aiuto – Articolo 108, paragrafi 2 e 3, TFUE – Regolamento (CE) n. 659/1999 – Articolo 4, paragrafi 3 e 4 – Nozione di “dubbi in ordine alla compatibilità con il mercato comune di una misura notificata” – Decisione di non sollevare obiezioni – Mancato avvio del procedimento d’indagine formale – Disciplina in materia di aiuti di Stato a favore dell’ambiente e dell’energia 2014‑2020 – Codice delle migliori pratiche applicabili nei procedimenti di controllo degli aiuti di Stato – Contatti di “pre‑notificazione” – Diritti procedurali delle parti interessate – Mercato della capacità di elettricità nel Regno Unito.#Causa C-57/19 P.
judgment · IT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (четвърти състав) от 2 септември 2021 г.#Европейска комисия срещу Tempus Energy Ltd и Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Обжалване — Държавни помощи — Схема за помощ — Член 108, параграфи 2 и 3 ДФЕС — Регламент (ЕО) № 659/1999 — Член 4, параграфи 3 и 4 — Понятие „съмнения в съвместимостта с общия пазар на мярка, за която е отправено уведомление“ — Решение да не се повдигат възражения — Незапочване на официалната процедура по разследване — Насоки относно държавната помощ за опазване на околната среда и за енергетика за периода 2014 — 2020 г. — Кодекс на най-добри практики при провеждане на процедури на контрол на държавните помощи — Контакти, „предхождащи уведомлението“ — Процесуални права на заинтересованите страни — Пазар на капацитет на електроенергия в Обединеното кралство.#Дело C-57/19 P.
judgment · BG · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Commission européenne contre Tempus Energy Ltd et Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Régime d’aide – Article 108, paragraphes 2 et 3, TFUE – Règlement (CE) no 659/1999 – Article 4, paragraphes 3 et 4 – Notion de “doutes quant à la compatibilité d’une mesure notifiée avec le marché commun” – Décision de ne pas soulever d’objections – Absence d’ouverture de la procédure formelle d’examen – Lignes directrices concernant les aides d’État à la protection de l’environnement et à l’énergie pour la période 2014-2020 – Code de bonnes pratiques pour la conduite des procédures de contrôle des aides d’État – Contacts de “prénotification” – Droits procéduraux des parties intéressées – Marché de capacité d’électricité au Royaume‑Uni.#Affaire C-57/19 P.
judgment · FR · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Tempus Energy Ltd and Tempus Energy Technology Ltd.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 4(3) and (4) – Concept of ‘doubts as to the compatibility of a notified measure with the common market’ – Decision not to raise objections – Formal investigation procedure not initiated – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Code of Best Practice for the conduct of State aid control procedures – ‘Pre-notification’ contacts – Procedural rights of interested parties – Electricity capacity market in the United Kingdom.#Case C-57/19 P.
judgment · EN · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · f96a4ac2-c781-11e6-a6db-01aa75ed71a1 · f96a4ac2-c781-11e6-a6db-01aa75ed71a1
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CJ0057
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d998fee2-0bc8-11ec-adb1-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62019CJ0057 · source updated 2 September 2021