European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62020CJ0265
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#FN v Universiteit Antwerpen and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Part-time work – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Part-time academic staff – Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post – Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds – No requirements.#Case C-265/20.
Introduced
5 May 2022
Last action
5 May 2022 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 May 2022
Records
Official record CELEX 62020CJ0265 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 5 May 2022. Status: decided.
Timeline
5 May 2022
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Domstolens dom (sjunde avdelningen) av den 5 maj 2022.#FN mot Universiteit Antwerpen m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Socialpolitik – Deltidsanställning – Direktiv 97/81/EG – Ramavtalet om deltidsarbete mellan UNICE, CEEP och EFS – Klausul 4.1 – Principen om icke-diskriminering – Deltidsanställd akademisk personal – Endast heltidsanställd akademisk personal får automatiskt fast anställning – Beräkning av den procentuella andel av en heltidsanställning som motsvaras av en deltidsanställning – Krav saknas.#Mål C-265/20.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (sjunde avdelningen) av den 5 maj 2022.#FN mot Universiteit Antwerpen m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Socialpolitik – Deltidsanställning – Direktiv 97/81/EG – Ramavtalet om deltidsarbete mellan UNICE, CEEP och EFS – Klausul 4.1 – Principen om icke-diskriminering – Deltidsanställd akademisk personal – Endast heltidsanställd akademisk personal får automatiskt fast anställning – Beräkning av den procentuella andel av en heltidsanställning som motsvaras av en deltidsanställning – Krav saknas.#Mål C-265/20.
judgment · SV · 5 May 2022
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Sétima Secção) de 5 de maio de 2022.#FN contra Universiteit Antwerpen e o.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reenvio prejudicial — Política social — Trabalho a tempo parcial — Diretiva 97/81/CE — Acordo‑Quadro CES, UNICE e CEEP Relativo ao Trabalho a Tempo Parcial — Cláusula 4, ponto 1 — Princípio de não discriminação — Pessoal docente a tempo parcial — Nomeação definitiva automática reservada a membros do pessoal docente que exercem funções de docência a tempo inteiro — Cálculo da percentagem de funções exercidas a tempo inteiro à qual correspondem funções exercidas a tempo parcial — Inexistência de requisitos.#Processo C-265/20.
judgment · PT · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Is-Seba’ Awla) tal-5 ta’ Mejju 2022.#FN vs Universiteit Antwerpen et.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Politika soċjali – Xogħol part-time – Direttiva 97/81/KE – Ftehim qafas bejn CES, UNICE u CEEP fuq ix-xogħol part-time – Klawżola 4(1) – Prinċipju ta’ nondiskriminazzjoni – Persunal akkademiku part-time – Ħatra b’mod permanenti awtomatika rriżervata lill-membri tal-persunal akkademiku li jeżerċitaw pożizzjoni ta’ tagħlim full-time – Kalkolu tal-perċentwali ta’ ammont ta’ xogħol full-time li jikkorrispondi għal piż ta’ xogħol part-time – Assenza ta’ rekwiżiti.#Kawża C-265/20.
judgment · MT · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (septītā palāta), 2022. gada 5. maijs.#FN pret Universiteit Antwerpen u.c.#Hof van beroep te Antwerpen lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Sociālā politika – Nepilna darba laika darbs – Direktīva 97/81/EK – UNICE, CEEP un EAK noslēgtais pamatnolīgums par nepilna darba laika darbu – 4. klauzulas 1. punkts – Diskriminācijas aizlieguma princips – Nepilnu darba laiku nodarbināts akadēmiskais personāls – Automātiska iecelšana pastāvīgā amatā, kas attiecas tikai uz akadēmiskā personāla locekļiem, kuri mācībspēka amatā strādā pilnu darba laiku – Nepilna darba laika darbam atbilstošās pilna darba laika darba procentuālās daļas aprēķins – Prasību neesamība.#Lieta C-265/20.
judgment · LV · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2022 m. gegužės 5 d. Teisingumo Teismo (septintoji kolegija) sprendimas.#FN prieš Universiteit Antwerpen ir kt.#Hof van beroep te Antwerpen prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Socialinė politika – Darbas ne visą darbo laiką – Direktyva 97/81 – UNICE, CEEP ir ETUC bendrasis susitarimas dėl darbo ne visą darbo dieną – 4 straipsnio 1 dalis – Nediskriminavimo principas – Akademinis personalas, dirbantis ne visą darbo dieną – Automatiškas paskyrimas visam laikui, taikomas tik dėstymo visą darbo dieną krūvį turintiems akademinio personalo nariams – Darbo visą darbo dieną krūvio procentinės dalies, kurią atitinka darbo ne visą darbo dieną krūvis, apskaičiavimas – Reikalavimų nebuvimas“.#Byla C-265/20.
judgment · LT · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (hetedik tanács), 2022. május 5.#FN kontra Universiteit Antwerpen és társai.#A Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Szociálpolitika – Részmunkaidős foglalkoztatás – 97/81/EK irányelv – Az UNICE, a CEEP és az ESZSZ által a részmunkaidős foglalkoztatásról kötött keretmegállapodás – A 4. szakasz 1. pontja – A hátrányos megkülönböztetés tilalmának elve – Részmunkaidőben foglalkoztatott felsőoktatási személyzet – A felsőoktatási személyzet teljes munkaidőben oktatási tevékenységet végző tagjai számára fenntartott automatikus végleges kinevezés – A teljes munkaidőben való munkavégzés azon százalékos arányának kiszámítása, amelynek a részmunkaidőben való munkavégzés megfelel – Követelmények hiánya.#C-265/20. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (seitsmes koda), 5.5.2022.#FN versus Universiteit Antwerpen jt.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Sotsiaalpoliitika – Osalise tööajaga töö – Direktiiv 97/81/EÜ – Euroopa Tööandjate Föderatsiooni, Euroopa Riigiosalusega Ettevõtete Keskuse ja Euroopa Ametiühingute Konföderatsiooni sõlmitud osalist tööaega käsitlev raamkokkulepe – Klausli 4 punkt 1 – Diskrimineerimiskeelu põhimõte – Osalise tööajaga akadeemiline personal – Automaatne alaliselt ametisse nimetamine, mis on ette nähtud akadeemilise personali täistööajaga õppetöö ülesandeid täitvatele liikmetele – Selle protsendimäära arvutamine, mille osaline töökoormus täistöökoormusest moodustab – Nõuete puudumine.#Kohtuasi C-265/20.
judgment · ET · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Séptima) de 5 de mayo de 2022.#FN contra Universiteit Antwerpen y otros.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Política social — Trabajo a tiempo parcial — Directiva 97/81/CE — Acuerdo Marco de la CES, la UNICE y el CEEP sobre el trabajo a tiempo parcial — Cláusula 4, apartado 1 — Principio de no discriminación — Personal académico a tiempo parcial — Nombramiento definitivo automático reservado a los miembros del personal académico que ejercen la docencia a tiempo completo — Cálculo del porcentaje de carga de trabajo a tiempo completo al que equivale una carga de trabajo a tiempo parcial — Inexistencia de requisitos.#Asunto C-265/20.
judgment · ES · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (έβδομο τμήμα) της 5ης Μαΐου 2022.#FN κατά Universiteit Antwerpen κ.λπ.#Αίτηση του Hof van beroep te Antwerpen για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Κοινωνική πολιτική – Εργασία με μειωμένο ωράριο – Οδηγία 97/81/ΕΚ – Συμφωνία-πλαίσιο για την εργασία μερικής απασχολήσεως που συνήφθη από την UNICE, το CEEP και την CES – Ρήτρα 4, σημείο 1 – Αρχή της απαγορεύσεως των διακρίσεων – Ακαδημαϊκό προσωπικό μερικής απασχολήσεως – Αυτόματος διορισμός σε μόνιμη θέση μόνον των μελών του ακαδημαϊκού προσωπικού τα οποία ασκούν διδακτικά καθήκοντα στο πλαίσιο καθεστώτος πλήρους απασχολήσεως – Υπολογισμός του ποσοστού του φόρτου εργασίας στο πλαίσιο πλήρους απασχολήσεως στο οποίο αντιστοιχεί φόρτος εργασίας στο πλαίσιο μερικής απασχολήσεως – Δεν τίθενται απαιτήσεις».#Υπόθεση C-265/20.
judgment · EL · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 5. Mai 2022.#FN gegen Universiteit Antwerpen u. a.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Teilzeitbeschäftigung – Richtlinie 97/81/EG – EGB-UNICE‑CEEP-Rahmenvereinbarung über Teilzeitarbeit – Paragraf 4 Nr. 1 – Grundsatz der Nichtdiskriminierung – Akademisches Personal in Teilzeitbeschäftigung – Automatische feste Ernennung, die den Mitgliedern des akademischen Personals vorbehalten ist, die einen Lehrauftrag in Vollzeit wahrnehmen – Berechnung des Prozentsatzes einer Vollzeitbeschäftigung, dem eine Teilzeitbeschäftigung entspricht – Keine Anforderungen.#Rechtssache C-265/20.
judgment · DE · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (sedmého senátu) ze dne 5. května 2022.#FN v. Universiteit Antwerpen a další.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Sociální politika – Částečný pracovní úvazek – Směrnice 97/81/ES – Rámcová dohoda UNICE, CEEP a EKOS o částečném pracovním úvazku – Ustanovení 4 bod 1 – Zásada zákazu diskriminace – Akademičtí pracovníci na částečný úvazek – Automatické jmenování na dobu neurčitou vyhrazené pro akademické pracovníky vykonávající pedagogickou činnost na plný úvazek – Výpočet procentního podílu práce na plný úvazek, kterému odpovídá práce na částečný úvazek – Absence požadavků“.#Věc C-265/20.
judgment · CS · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 5. maja 2022.#FN proti Universiteit Antwerpen in drugim.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Predhodno odločanje – Socialna politika – Delo s krajšim delovnim časom – Direktiva 97/81/ES – Okvirni sporazum ETUC, UNICE in CEEP o delu s krajšim delovnim časom – Določba 4(1) – Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije – Akademsko osebje, zaposleno s krajšim delovnim časom – Samodejno imenovanje članov akademskega osebja, ki izvaja pedagoško obveznost za polni delovni čas, za nedoločen čas – Izračun odstotka delovne obremenitve zaposlitve s polnim delovnim časom, ki ustreza delovni obremenitvi zaposlitve s krajšim delovnim časom – Neobstoj zahtev.#Zadeva C-265/20.
judgment · SL · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (siódma izba) z dnia 5 maja 2022 r.#FN przeciwko Universiteit Antwerpen i in.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Polityka społeczna – Praca w niepełnym wymiarze czasu pracy – Dyrektywa 97/81/WE – Porozumienie ramowe dotyczące pracy w niepełnym wymiarze czasu pracy zawarte przez UNICE, CEEP oraz ETUC – Klauzula 4 pkt 1 – Zasada niedyskryminacji – Nauczyciele akademiccy zatrudnieni w niepełnym wymiarze czasu pracy – Możliwość automatycznego mianowania na stałe zastrzeżona dla nauczycieli akademickich prowadzących zajęcia dydaktyczne w pełnym wymiarze zajęć – Obliczenie procentowego udziału pracy wykonywanej w pełnym wymiarze czasu pracy w stosunku do pracy wykonywanej w niepełnym wymiarze czasu pracy – Brak wymogów.#Sprawa C-265/20.
judgment · PL · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Settima Sezione) del 5 maggio 2022.#FN contro Universiteit Antwerpen e a.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dall'Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Politica sociale – Lavoro a tempo parziale – Direttiva 97/81/CE – Accordo quadro CES, UNICE e CEEP sul lavoro a tempo parziale – Clausola 4, punto 1 – Principio di non discriminazione – Personale accademico a tempo parziale – Nomina in ruolo automatica riservata ai membri del personale accademico che svolgono un incarico di insegnamento a tempo pieno – Calcolo della percentuale di un incarico di lavoro a tempo pieno alla quale corrisponde un incarico di lavoro a tempo parziale – Insussistenza dei requisiti.#Causa C-265/20.
judgment · IT · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (seitsemäs jaosto) 5.5.2022.#FN vastaan Universiteit Antwerpen ym.#Hof van beroep te Antwerpenin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Sosiaalipolitiikka – Osa-aikatyö – Direktiivi 97/81/EY – EAY:n, UNICE:n ja CEEP:n tekemä osa-aikatyötä koskeva puitesopimus – 4 lausekkeen 1 kohta – Syrjimättömyyden periaate – Osa-aikainen akateeminen henkilöstö – Automaattinen vakinaistaminen, joka on varattu kokoaikaista opetustehtävää hoitavan akateemisen henkilöstön jäsenille – Osa-aikaisen työajan prosenttiosuuden laskeminen vastaavasta kokoaikaisesta työajasta – Vaatimusten puuttuminen.#Asia C-265/20.
judgment · FI · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (седми състав) от 5 май 2022 г.#FN срещу Universiteit Antwerpen и др.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Преюдициално запитване — Социална политика — Работа на непълно работно време — Директива 97/81/ЕО — Рамково споразумение за работа при непълно работно време, сключено между Съюза на конфедерациите на индустриалците и на работодателите в Европа (UNICE), Европейския център на предприятията с държавно участие (CEEP) и Европейската конфедерация на профсъюзите (ЕКП) — Клауза 4, точка 1 — Принцип на недискриминация — Академичен персонал на непълно работно време — Автоматично назначаване на постоянен договор, предвидено само за членовете на академичния персонал, имащи учебна заетост на пълно работно време — Изчисляване на какъв процент от трудовата заетост на пълно работно време отговаря съответната трудова заетост на непълно работно време — Липса на изисквания.#Дело C-265/20.
judgment · BG · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 5. maj 2022.#FN mod Universiteit Antwerpen m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – deltidsansættelse – direktiv 97/81/EF – rammeaftalen om deltidsarbejde indgået af UNICE, CEEP og EFS – § 4, stk. 1 – princip mod forskelsbehandling – deltidsansat akademisk personale – automatisk fastansættelse forbeholdt akademisk personale, der udfører undervisningsopgaver på fuld tid – beregning af den procentdel af en fuldtidsansats arbejdsbyrde, som en deltidsansats arbejdsbyrde svarer til – ingen krav.#Sag C-265/20.
judgment · DA · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a șaptea) din 5 mai 2022.#FN împotriva Universiteit Antwerpen ș.a.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Trimitere preliminară – Politica socială – Muncă pe fracțiune de normă – Directiva 97/81/CE – Acordul‑cadru CES, UCIPE și CEIP privind munca pe fracțiune de normă – Clauza 4 alineatul (1) – Principiul nediscriminării – Personal academic încadrat cu fracțiune de normă – Numire automată cu titlu permanent rezervată membrilor personalului academic încadrați într‑o funcție didactică cu normă întreagă – Calculul procentului dintr‑o sarcină de lucru cu normă întreagă căruia îi corespunde o sarcină de lucru pe fracțiune de normă – Lipsa cerințelor”.#Cauza C-265/20.
judgment · RO · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (sedmo vijeće) od 5. svibnja 2022.#FN protiv Universiteit Antwerpen i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Socijalna politika – Rad u nepunom radnom vremenu – Direktiva 97/81/EZ – Okvirni sporazum o radu s nepunim radnim vremenom koji su sklopili UNICE, CEEP i ETUC – Članak 4. točka 1. – Načelo nediskriminacije – Akademsko osoblje koje radi u nepunom radnom vremenu – Automatsko imenovanje za stalno samo onih članova akademskog osoblja koji obavljaju nastavnu djelatnost u punom radnom vremenu – Izračun postotka radnog opterećenja u punom radnom vremenu kojem odgovara radno opterećenje u nepunom radnom vremenu – Nepostojanje zahtjevâ.#Predmet C-265/20.
judgment · HR · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (siedma komora) z 5. mája 2022.#FN proti Universiteit Antwerpen a i.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Sociálna politika – Práca na kratší pracovný čas – Smernica 97/81/ES – Rámcová dohoda o práci na kratší pracovný čas, ktorú uzavreli ETUC, UNICE a CEEP – Doložka 4 bod 1 – Zásada nediskriminácie – Akademickí pracovníci na kratší pracovný čas – Automatické vymenovanie na dobu neurčitú vyhradené pre akademických pracovníkov vykonávajúcich pedagogickú činnosť na plný úväzok – Výpočet percentuálneho podielu pracovného zaťaženia na plný úväzok, ktorému zodpovedá pracovné zaťaženie na kratší pracovný čas – Neexistencia požiadaviek.#Vec C-265/20.
judgment · SK · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Zevende kamer) van 5 mei 2022.#FN tegen Universiteit Antwerpen e.a.#Verzoek van het hof van beroep te Antwerpen om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Sociale politiek – Deeltijdarbeid – Richtlijn 97/81/EG – Raamovereenkomst EVV, Unice en CEEP inzake deeltijdarbeid – Clausule 4, punt 1 – Beginsel van gelijke behandeling – Deeltijds academisch personeel – Automatische vaste benoeming voorbehouden aan leden van het academisch personeel met een voltijdse onderwijsopdracht – Berekening van het percentage van een voltijdse opdracht dat een deeltijdse opdracht vertegenwoordigt – Geen vereisten.#Zaak C-265/20.
judgment · NL · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#FN contre Universiteit Antwerpen e.a.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Travail à temps partiel – Directive 97/81/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à temps partiel – Clause 4, point 1 – Principe de non-discrimination – Personnel académique à temps partiel – Nomination à titre définitif automatique réservée aux membres du personnel académique exerçant une charge d’enseignement à temps plein – Calcul du pourcentage d’une charge de travail à temps plein auquel correspond une charge de travail à temps partiel – Absence d’exigences».#Affaire C-265/20.
judgment · FR · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#FN v Universiteit Antwerpen and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Part-time work – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Part-time academic staff – Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post – Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds – No requirements.#Case C-265/20.
judgment · EN · 5 May 2022
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · 9944ba0b-c051-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1 · 9944ba0b-c051-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CJ0265
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f0c847da-cc50-11ec-b6f4-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62020CJ0265 · source updated 5 May 2022