other · European Union

9944ba0b-c051-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1

Members

No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0059decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Italian Republic and Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – EU bodies, offices and agencies – European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Competence to determine the location of the seat – Article 341 TFEU – Scope – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting – Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU – Author and legal nature of the act – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order.#Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0106decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Italian Republic and Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 – Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam (Netherlands) – Article 263 TFEU – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Direct and individual concern – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting in order to determine the location of the seat of an EU agency – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order – Prerogatives of the European Parliament.#Joined Cases C-106/19 and C-232/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0743decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#European Parliament v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union – European Labour Authority (ELA) – Competence to determine the location of the seat – Article 341 TFEU – Scope – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting – Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU – Author and legal nature of the act – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order.#Case C-743/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Directive (EU) 2019/692 – Extension of the application of Directive 2009/73 to gas lines between Member States and third countries – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Condition that an applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Lack of discretion as to the obligations imposed on the appellant – Condition that an applicant must be individually concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Arrangements for the exemptions and derogations excluding the appellant as the sole operator from their benefit – Request that documents be removed from the case file – Rules on the production of evidence before the EU Courts – Documents internal to the European Union institutions.#Case C-348/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0265decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#FN v Universiteit Antwerpen and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Part-time work – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Part-time academic staff – Automatic permanent appointments reserved for academic staff members holding a full-time teaching post – Calculation of the percentage of a full-time workload to which a part-time workload corresponds – No requirements.#Case C-265/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 May 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0510decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Environment – Directive 2008/56/EC – Marine environmental policy – Article 5 – Marine strategies – Article 17(2) and (3) – Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets – Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limits, details of any updates made following the reviews.#Case C-510/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0132decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022.#BN and Others v Getin Noble Bank S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court – Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime – Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates – Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed – Possibility of regarding that body as an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law.#Case C-132/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0245decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#X and Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Competence of the supervisory authority – Article 55(3) – Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity – Concept – Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data.#Case C-245/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0117decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Postal services – Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider – Fine imposed by a national postal regulator – Fine imposed by a national competition authority – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Duplication of proceedings and penalties – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-117/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0151decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-151/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0219decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 3(1)(c) – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Article 5 – Penalties – Limitation period – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-219/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0177decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Environment – Type approval of motor vehicles – Regulation (EU) 2016/646 – Emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) – Setting of the not-to-exceed (NTE) values for emissions of oxides of nitrogen during the real driving emission (RDE) tests – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Admissibility of an action – Infra-State entity with powers in the field of environmental protection to limit the circulation of certain vehicles – Condition that the applicant must be directly concerned.#Joined Cases C-177/19 P to C-179/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0055decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#Minister Sprawiedliwości v Prokurator Krajowy – Pierwszy Zastępca Prokuratora Generalnego and Rzecznik Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Disciplinary investigation initiated against a lawyer – Decision of the Disciplinary Agent finding that there was no disciplinary offence and terminating the investigation – Appeal by the Minister for Justice to the Bar Association Disciplinary Court – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 4, point (6), and Article 10(6) – Authorisation scheme – Withdrawal of authorisation – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Not applicable.#Case C-55/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0377decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#Benedetti Pietro e Angelo S.S. and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Milk and milk products sector – Quotas – Additional levy – Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 – Deliveries exceeding the producer’s available reference quantity – Collection of the contribution to the excess levy by the purchaser – Refund of levies overpaid – Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 – Article 16 – Criteria for redistributing the excess levy.#Case C-377/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 January 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0748decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 November 2021.#Criminal proceedings against WB and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – National legislation providing the possibility for the Minister for Justice to second judges to higher courts and to terminate those secondments – Adjudicating panels in criminal cases including judges seconded by the Minister for Justice – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Presumption of innocence.#Joined Cases C-748/19 to C-754/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0819decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Stichting Cartel Compensation and Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 81, 84 and 85 EC – Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Conduct of undertakings in the context of air transport between the European Economic Area (EEA) and third countries that occurred under Articles 84 and 85 EC – Claim for compensation for damage suffered – Jurisdiction of national courts to apply Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.#Case C-819/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0852decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European investigation order in criminal matters – Article 14 – Legal remedies – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Absence of legal remedies in the issuing Member State – Decision ordering searches, seizures and a hearing of a witness by videoconference.#Case C-852/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 November 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0688decided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 October 2021.#HG and TC v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 3, first paragraph – Obligation to take out a contract of insurance – Scope – Unroadworthy vehicle, not registered and officially withdrawn from use.#Case C-688/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0683decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#Viesgo Infraestructuras Energéticas SL v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common rules for the internal market in electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(2) and (6) – Imposition of public service obligations – Financing of a regulated discount for the purpose of the protection of vulnerable consumers – Requirements of transparency and non-discrimination.#Case C-683/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 October 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0464decided