PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62022TJ0757

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-757/22.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

8 May 2024

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 May 2024

Records

Official record CELEX 62022TJ0757 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 8 May 2024. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-757/22.

View fileDownload file

  • Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-757/22.

    judgment · EN · 8 May 2024

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.