European Union · Record · CO
CELEX 62023CO0120
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should be allowed to proceed) of 5 July 2023.#Lin Suicha v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-120/23 P.
Introduced
5 July 2023
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 July 2023
Records
Official record CELEX 62023CO0120 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 5 July 2023. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should be allowed to proceed) of 5 July 2023.#Lin Suicha v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-120/23 P.
judgment · EN · 5 July 2023
Domstolens beslut av den 5 juli 2023.#Lin Suicha mot Europeiska unionens immaterialrättsmyndighet (EUIPO).#Mål C-120/23 P.
judgment · SV · 5 July 2023
Sklep Sodišča z dne 5. julija 2023.#Lin Suicha proti Uradu Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino.#Zadeva C-120/23 P.
judgment · SL · 5 July 2023
Uznesenie Súdneho dvora z 5. júla 2023.#Lin Suicha v. Úrad Európskej únie pre duševné vlastníctvo.#Vec C-120/23 P.
judgment · SK · 5 July 2023
Ordonanța Curții (Camera de admitere în principiu a recursurilor) din 5 iulie 2023.#Lin Suicha împotriva Oficiului Uniunii Europene pentru Proprietate Intelectuală (EUIPO).#Cauza C-120/23 P.
judgment · RO · 5 July 2023
Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Secção de recebimento dos recursos de decisões do Tribunal Geral) de 5 de julho de 2023.#Lin Suicha contra Instituto da Propriedade Intelectual da União Europeia (EUIPO).#Processo C-120/23 P.
judgment · PT · 5 July 2023
Postanowienie Trybunału z dnia 5 lipca 2023 r.#Lin Suicha przeciwko Urzędowi Unii Europejskiej ds. Własności Intelektualnej.#Sprawa C-120/23 P.
judgment · PL · 5 July 2023
Beschikking van het Hof (Kamer voor toelating van hogere voorzieningen) van 5 juli 2023.#Lin Suicha tegen Bureau voor intellectuele eigendom van de Europese Unie (EUIPO).#Zaak C-120/23 P.
judgment · NL · 5 July 2023
Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Awla tal-Ammissjoni tal-Appelli) tal-5 ta’ Lulju 2023.#Lin Suicha vs L-Uffiċċju tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali tal-Unjoni Ewropea (EUIPO).#Kawża C-120/23 P.
judgment · MT · 5 July 2023
Tiesas (apelācijas sūdzību pieļaujamības vērtējuma palāta) rīkojums, 2023. gada 5. jūlijs.#Lin Suicha pret Eiropas Savienības Intelektuālā īpašuma biroju (EUIPO).#Lieta C-120/23 P.
judgment · LV · 5 July 2023
2023 m. liepos 5 d. Teisingumo Teismo (prašymus priimti apeliacinį skundą nagrinėjanti kolegija) nutartis.#Lin Suicha prieš Europos Sąjungos intelektinės nuosavybės tarnybą (EUIPO).#Byla C-120/23 P.
judgment · LT · 5 July 2023
Ordinanza della Corte (Sezione per l’ammissione delle impugnazioni) del 5 luglio 2023.#Lin Suicha contro Ufficio dell’Unione europea per la proprietà intellettuale (EUIPO).#Causa C-120/23 P.
judgment · IT · 5 July 2023
A Bíróság végzése, 2023. július 5.#Lin Suicha kontra az Európai Unió Szellemi Tulajdoni Hivatala (EUIPO).#C-120/23. P. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 5 July 2023
Rješenje Suda 05. srpnja 2023.#Lin Suicha protiv Ured Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo.#Predmet C-120/23 P.
judgment · HR · 5 July 2023
Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys 5.7.2023.#Lin Suicha vastaan Euroopan unionin teollisoikeuksien virasto (EUIPO).#Asia C-120/23 P.
judgment · FI · 5 July 2023
Euroopa Kohtu määrus, 5.7.2023.#Lin Suicha versus Euroopa Liidu Intellektuaalomandi Amet.#Kohtuasi C-120/23 P.
judgment · ET · 5 July 2023
Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala de Admisión a Trámite de Recursos de Casación) de 5 de julio de 2023.#Lin Suicha contra Oficina de Propiedad Intelectual de la Unión Europea (EUIPO).#Asunto C-120/23 P.
judgment · ES · 5 July 2023
Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου της 5ης Ιουλίου 2023.#Lin Suicha κατά Γραφείου Διανοητικής Ιδιοκτησίας της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.#Υπόθεση C-120/23 P.
judgment · EL · 5 July 2023
Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Kammer für die Zulassung von Rechtsmitteln) vom 5. Juli 2023.#Lin Suicha gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum (EUIPO).#Rechtssache C-120/23 P.
judgment · DE · 5 July 2023
Domstolens kendelse (afdelingen for bevilling af appel) af 5. juli 2023.#Lin Suicha mod Den Europæiske Unions Kontor for Intellektuel Ejendomsret (EUIPO).#Sag C-120/23 P.
judgment · DA · 5 July 2023
Usnesení Soudního dvora (senátu rozhodujícího o přijatelnosti kasačních opravných prostředků) ze dne 5. července 2023.#Lin Suicha v. Úřad Evropské unie pro duševní vlastnictví (EUIPO).#Věc C-120/23 P.
judgment · CS · 5 July 2023
Определение на Съда от 5 юли 2023 г.#Lin Suicha срещу Служба на Европейския съюз за интелектуална собственост.#Дело C-120/23 P.
judgment · BG · 5 July 2023
Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 5 juillet 2023.#Lin Suicha contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-120/23 P.
judgment · FR · 5 July 2023
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.