PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62023TJ1052

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

28 January 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 January 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62023TJ1052 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 28 January 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

  • Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

    judgment · EN · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Vispārējās tiesas spriedums (devītā palāta), 2026. gada 28. janvāris.#UH pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Lieta T-1052/23.

    judgment · LV · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rozsudek Tribunálu (devátého senátu) ze dne 28. ledna 2026.#UH v. Evropská komise.#Věc T-1052/23.

    judgment · CS · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sentenza tal-Qorti Ġenerali (Id-Disa’ Awla) tat-28 ta’ Jannar 2026.#UH vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Kawża T-1052/23.

    judgment · MT · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rettens dom (Niende Afdeling) af 28. januar 2026.#UH mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Sag T-1052/23.

    judgment · DA · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sentenza del Tribunale (Nona Sezione) del 28 gennaio 2026.#UH contro Commissione europea.#Causa T-1052/23.

    judgment · IT · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2026 m. sausio 28 d. Bendrojo Teismo (devintoji kolegija) sprendimas.#UH prieš Europos Komisiją.#Byla T-1052/23.

    judgment · LT · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Решение на Общия съд (девети състав) от 28 януари 2026 г.#UH срещу Европейска комисия.#Дело T-1052/23.

    judgment · BG · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sodba Splošnega sodišča (deveti senat) z dne 28. januarja 2026.#UH proti Evropski komisiji.#Zadeva T-1052/23.

    judgment · SL · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Presuda Općeg suda (deveto vijeće) od 28. siječnja 2026.#UH protiv Europske komisije.#Predmet T-1052/23.

    judgment · HR · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Tribunalens dom (nionde avdelningen) av den 28 januari 2026.#UH mot Europeiska kommissionen.#Mål T-1052/23.

    judgment · SV · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • A Törvényszék ítélete (kilencedik tanács), 2026. január 28.#UH kontra Európai Bizottság.#T-1052/23. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Hotărârea Tribunalului (Camera a noua) din 28 ianuarie 2026.#UH împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Cauza T-1052/23.

    judgment · RO · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rozsudok Všeobecného súdu (deviata komora) z 28. januára 2026.#UH v. Európska komisia.#Vec T-1052/23.

    judgment · SK · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen tuomio (yhdeksäs jaosto) 28.1.2026.#UH vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Asia T-1052/23.

    judgment · FI · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Nona Secção) de 28 de janeiro de 2026.#UH contra Comissão Europeia.#Processo T-1052/23.

    judgment · PT · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Novena) de 28 de enero de 2026.#UH contra Comisión Europea.#Asunto T-1052/23.

    judgment · ES · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Üldkohtu otsus (üheksas koda), 28.1.2026.#UH versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Kohtuasi T-1052/23.

    judgment · ET · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrest van het Gerecht (Negende kamer) van 28 januari 2026.#UH tegen Europese Commissie.#Zaak T-1052/23.

    judgment · NL · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Urteil des Gerichts (Neunte Kammer) vom 28. Januar 2026.#UH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtssache T-1052/23.

    judgment · DE · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Wyrok Sądu (dziewiąta izba) z dnia 28 stycznia 2026 r.#UH przeciwko Komisji Europejskiej.#Sprawa T-1052/23.

    judgment · PL · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Απόφαση του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (ένατο τμήμα) της 28ης Ιανουαρίου 2026.#UH κατά Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.#Υπόθεση T-1052/23.

    judgment · EL · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 28 janvier 2026.#UH contre Commission européenne.#Marchés publics de services – Soutien de l’enseignement juridique supérieur dans un État tiers – Exécution d’un contrat de services – Faute professionnelle et manquements graves à des obligations essentielles commis par le cocontractant – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Enquête de l’OLAF – Exclusion des procédures de marchés publics pour une période de deux ans – Existence d’un consortium – Erreur de fait – Erreur de droit – Sécurité juridique – Prescription – Non-rétroactivité.#Affaire T-1052/23.

    judgment · FR · 28 January 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.