European Union · Record · TJ
CELEX 62024TJ0261
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-261/24.
Introduced
15 July 2026
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
15 July 2026
Records
Official record CELEX 62024TJ0261 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 15 July 2026. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
2 official files
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-261/24.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Restrictive measures against Belarus – Prohibition on the purchase, import or transfer of potash products from Belarus – Prevention of the transit of potash from Belarus via the territory of Lithuania – Application seeking assessment of the legality of a provision that does not provide for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 275 TFEU – Application for a direction to be issued – Partial lack of jurisdiction – Breach of procedural requirements – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – No call to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-261/24.
judgment · EN · 15 July 2026
Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Birių Krovinių Terminalas UAB contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Recours en annulation – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de la Biélorussie – Interdiction d’achat, d’importation ou de transfert de produits à base de potasse en provenance de Biélorussie – Empêchement du transit de potasse, en provenance de Biélorussie, via le territoire de la Lituanie – Demande visant à apprécier la légalité d’une disposition ne prévoyant pas des mesures restrictives à l’encontre de personnes physiques ou morales au sens de l’article 275, second alinéa, TFUE – Demande d’injonction – Incompétence partielle – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Délai de recours – Irrecevabilité partielle – Recours en carence – Absence d’invitation à agir – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-261/24.
judgment · FR · 15 July 2026
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.