PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TO

CELEX 62024TO0587

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

2 February 2026

Last action

2 February 2026 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

European Union

Source updated

2 February 2026

European Union

Records

Official record CELEX 62024TO0587 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 February 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 2 February 2026

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.

View fileDownload file

  • Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.

    judgment · EN · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Uznesenie Všeobecného súdu (štvrtá komora) z 2. februára 2026.#GE v. Agentúra Európskej únie pre justičnú spoluprácu v trestných veciach a Agentúra Európskej únie pre spoluprácu v oblasti presadzovania práva.#Vec T-587/24.

    judgment · SK · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen määräys (neljäs jaosto) 2.2.2026.#GE vastaan Euroopan unionin rikosoikeudellisen yhteistyön virasto (Eurojust) ja Euroopan unionin lainvalvontayhteistyövirasto (Europol).#Asia T-587/24.

    judgment · FI · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sklep Splošnega sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 2. februarja 2026.#GE proti Agenciji Evropske unije za pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah in Agenciji Evropske unije za sodelovanje na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj.#Zadeva T-587/24.

    judgment · SL · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rješenje Općeg suda (četvrto vijeće) od 2. veljače 2026.#GE protiv Agencije Europske unije za suradnju u kaznenom pravosuđu i Agencije Europske unije za suradnju tijela za izvršavanje zakonodavstva.#Predmet T-587/24.

    judgment · HR · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonanța Tribunalului (Camera a patra) din 2 februarie 2026.#GE împotriva Agenției Uniunii Europene pentru Cooperare în Materie de Justiție Penală și a Agenției Uniunii Europene pentru Cooperare în Materie de Aplicare a Legii.#Cauza T-587/24.

    judgment · RO · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2026 m. vasario 2 d. Bendrojo Teismo (ketvirtoji kolegija) nutartis.#GE prieš Europos Sąjungos bendradarbiavimo baudžiamosios teisenos srityje agentūrą ir Europos Sąjungos teisėsaugos bendradarbiavimo agentūrą.#Byla T-587/24.

    judgment · LT · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Определение на Общия съд (четвърти състав) от 2 февруари 2026 г.#GE срещу Агенция на Европейския съюз за сътрудничество в областта на наказателното правосъдие и Агенция на Европейския съюз за сътрудничество в областта на правоприлагането.#Дело T-587/24.

    judgment · BG · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Vispārējās tiesas (ceturtā palāta) rīkojums, 2026. gada 2. februāris.#GE pret Eiropas Savienības Aģentūra tiesu iestāžu sadarbībai krimināllietās un Eiropas Savienības Aģentūra tiesībaizsardzības sadarbībai.#Lieta T-587/24.

    judgment · LV · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Usnesení Tribunálu (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 2. února 2026.#GE v. Agentura Evropské unie pro justiční spolupráci v trestních věcech a Agentura Evropské unie pro spolupráci v oblasti prosazování práva.#Věc T-587/24.

    judgment · CS · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Tribunalens beslut (fjärde avdelningen) av den 2 februari 2026.#GE mot Europeiska unionens byrå för straffrättsligt samarbete och Europeiska unionens byrå för samarbete inom brottsbekämpning.#Mål T-587/24.

    judgment · SV · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • A Törvényszék végzése (negyedik tanács), 2026. február 2.#GE kontra Az Európai Unió Büntető Igazságügyi Együttműködési Ügynöksége és a Bűnüldözési Együttműködés Európai Uniós Ügynöksége.#T-587/24. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordinanza del Tribunale (Quarta Sezione) del 2 febbraio 2026.#GE contro Agenzia dell'Unione europea per la cooperazione giudiziaria penale e Agenzia dell’Unione europea per la cooperazione nell’attività di contrasto.#Causa T-587/24.

    judgment · IT · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Postanowienie Sądu (czwarta izba) z dnia 2 lutego 2026 r.#GE przeciwko Agencji Unii Europejskiej ds. Współpracy Wymiarów Sprawiedliwości w Sprawach Karnych i Agencji Unii Europejskiej ds. Współpracy Organów Ścigania.#Sprawa T-587/24.

    judgment · PL · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Διάταξη του Γενικού Δικαστηρίου (τέταρτο τμήμα) της 2ας Φεβρουαρίου 2026.#GE κατά Οργανισμού της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης για τη Συνεργασία στον Τομέα της Ποινικής Δικαιοσύνης και Οργανισμού της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης για τη συνεργασία στον τομέα της επιβολής του νόμου.#Υπόθεση T-587/24.

    judgment · EL · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Despacho do Tribunal Geral (Quarta Secção) de 2 de fevereiro de 2026.#GE contra Agência da União Europeia para a Cooperação Judiciária Penal (Eurojust) e Agência da União Europeia para a Cooperação Policial (Europol).#Processo T-587/24.

    judgment · PT · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Auto del Tribunal General (Sala Cuarta) de 2 de febrero de 2026.#GE contra Agencia de la Unión Europea para la Cooperación Judicial Penal y Agencia de la Unión Europea para la Cooperación Policial.#Asunto T-587/24.

    judgment · ES · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Digriet tal-Qorti Ġenerali (Ir-Raba’ Awla) tat-2 ta’ Frar 2026.#GE vs L-Aġenzija tal-Unjoni Ewropea għall-Kooperazzjoni fil-Ġustizzja Kriminali u L-Aġenzija tal-Unjoni Ewropea għall-Kooperazzjoni fl-Infurzar tal-Liġi.#Kawża T-587/24.

    judgment · MT · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rettens kendelse (Fjerde Afdeling) af 2. februar 2026.#GE mod Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Strafferetligt Samarbejde og Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Retshåndhævelsessamarbejde.#Sag T-587/24.

    judgment · DA · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Beschikking van het Gerecht (Vierde kamer) van 2 februari 2026.#GE tegen Agentschap van de Europese Unie voor justitiële samenwerking in strafzaken en Agentschap van de Europese Unie voor samenwerking op het gebied van rechtshandhaving.#Zaak T-587/24.

    judgment · NL · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Beschluss des Gerichts (Vierte Kammer) vom 2. Februar 2026.#GE gegen Agentur der Europäischen Union für justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen und Agentur der Europäischen Union für die Zusammenarbeit auf dem Gebiet der Strafverfolgung.#Rechtssache T-587/24.

    judgment · DE · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Üldkohtu määrus (neljas koda), 2.2.2026.#GE versus Euroopa Liidu Kriminaalõigusalase Koostöö Amet ja Euroopa Liidu Õiguskaitsekoostöö Amet.#Kohtuasi T-587/24.

    judgment · ET · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 2 février 2026.#GE contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Coopération des autorités de police et des autres services répressifs des États membres – Prétendus traitements illicites de données à caractère personnel – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Dispositions pratiques d’exécution du règlement de procédure – Précision des renvois aux annexes – Recours en partie porté devant une juridiction manifestement incompétente pour en connaître, en partie manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-587/24.

    judgment · FR · 2 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

  • · GCEU · General Court

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.