Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.

Records

Official record CELEX 62025CO0049 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 22 May 2025. Status: decided.

Timeline

1. 22 May 2025

   Decided

   Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

• Order of the Court of 22 May 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/25 P.

  judgment · EN · 22 May 2025

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Ordonnance de la Cour du 22 mai 2025.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-49/25 P.

  judgment · FR · 22 May 2025

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.