PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62025CO0620

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

3 February 2026

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 February 2026

Records

Official record CELEX 62025CO0620 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 3 February 2026. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

  • Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P.

    judgment · EN · 3 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 3 février 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-620/25 P.

    judgment · FR · 3 February 2026

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.