European Union · Report · CC
CELEX 62020CC0151
Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-151/20.
Introduced
2 September 2021
Last action
2 September 2021 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
European Union
Source updated
2 September 2021
Records
Official report CELEX 62020CC0151 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 September 2021. Status: decided.
Timeline
2 September 2021
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Opinia rzecznika generalnego M. Bobeka przedstawiona w dniu 2 września 2021 r.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde przeciwko Nordzucker AG i in.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Oberster Gerichtshof.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Konkurencja – Artykuł 101 TFUE – Kartel ścigany przez dwa krajowe organy ochrony konkurencji – Karta praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Artykuł 50 – Zasada ne bis in idem – Tożsamość czynu – Artykuł 52 ust. 1 – Ograniczenia w stosowaniu zasady ne bis in idem – Przesłanki – Realizacja celu interesu ogólnego – Proporcjonalność.#Sprawa C-151/20.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinia rzecznika generalnego M. Bobeka przedstawiona w dniu 2 września 2021 r.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde przeciwko Nordzucker AG i in.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Oberster Gerichtshof.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Konkurencja – Artykuł 101 TFUE – Kartel ścigany przez dwa krajowe organy ochrony konkurencji – Karta praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Artykuł 50 – Zasada ne bis in idem – Tożsamość czynu – Artykuł 52 ust. 1 – Ograniczenia w stosowaniu zasady ne bis in idem – Przesłanki – Realizacja celu interesu ogólnego – Proporcjonalność.#Sprawa C-151/20.
judgment · PL · 2 September 2021
Návrhy prednesené 2. septembra 2021 – generálny advokát M. Bobek.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde proti Nordzucker AG a i.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Oberster Gerichtshof.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Hospodárska súťaž – Článok 101 ZFEÚ – Kartel stíhaný dvoma vnútroštátnymi orgánmi hospodárskej súťaže – Charta základných práv Európskej únie – Článok 50 – Zásada ne bis in idem – Existencia rovnakého porušenia – Článok 52 ods. 1 – Obmedzenia zásady ne bis in idem – Podmienky – Sledovanie cieľa všeobecného záujmu – Proporcionalita.#Vec C-151/20.
judgment · SK · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Concluziile avocatului general M. Bobek prezentate la 2 septembrie 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde împotriva Nordzucker AG ș.a.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Oberster Gerichtshof.#Trimitere preliminară – Concurență – Articolul 101 TFUE – Înțelegere urmărită de două autorități naționale de concurență – Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene – Articolul 50 – Principiul ne bis in idem – Existența aceleiași încălcări – Articolul 52 alineatul (1) – Restrângeri aduse principiului ne bis in idem – Condiții – Urmărirea unui obiectiv de interes general – Proporționalitate.#Cauza C-151/20.
judgment · RO · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Konklużjonijiet tal-Avukat Ġenerali M. Bobek, ippreżentati fit-2 ta’ Settembru 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde vs Nordzucker AG et.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-Oberster Gerichtshof.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Kompetizzjoni – Artikolu 101 TFUE – Tressiq ta’ proċeduri kontra akkordju minn żewġ awtoritajiet nazzjonali tal-kompetizzjoni – Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali tal-Unjoni Ewropea – Artikolu 50 – Prinċipju ta’ ne bis in idem – Eżistenza tal-istess reat – Artikolu 52(1) – Limitazzjonijiet għall-prinċipju ta’ ne bis in idem – Kundizzjonijiet – Tfittxija ta’ għan ta’ interess ġenerali – Proporzjonalità.#Kawża C-151/20.
judgment · MT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Forslag til afgørelse fra generaladvokat M. Bobek fremsat den 2. september 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde mod Nordzucker AG m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Oberster Gerichtshof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – konkurrence – artikel 101 TEUF – kartel, der retsforfølges af to nationale konkurrencemyndigheder – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – artikel 50 – princippet ne bis in idem – spørgsmålet, om der er tale om samme lovovertrædelse – artikel 52, stk. 1 – begrænsninger af princippet ne bis in idem – betingelser – varetagelse af et mål af almen interesse – proportionalitet.#Sag C-151/20.
judgment · DA · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca M. Bobka, predstavljeni 2. septembra 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde proti Nordzucker AG in drugim.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Oberster Gerichtshof.#Predhodno odločanje – Konkurenca – Člen 101 PDEU – Omejevalni sporazum, ki ga preiskujeta dva nacionalna organa, pristojna za konkurenco – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 50 – Načelo ne bis in idem – Obstoj istega kaznivega dejanja – Člen 52(1) – Omejitve načela ne bis in idem – Pogoji – Doseganje cilja v splošnem interesu – Sorazmernost.#Zadeva C-151/20.
judgment · SL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale M. Bobek, presentate il 2 settembre 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde contro Nordzucker AG e a.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dall'Oberster Gerichtshof.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Concorrenza – Articolo 101 TFUE – Intesa perseguita da due autorità nazionali garanti della concorrenza – Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea – Articolo 50 – Principio del ne bis in idem – Esistenza di una stessa infrazione – Articolo 52, paragrafo 1 – Limitazioni apportate al principio del ne bis in idem – Presupposti – Perseguimento di un obiettivo d’interesse generale – Proporzionalità.#Causa C-151/20.
judgment · IT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Julkisasiamies M. Bobekin ratkaisuehdotus 2.9.2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde vastaan Nordzucker AG ym.#Oberster Gerichtshofin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Kilpailu – SEUT 101 artikla – Kahden kansallisen kilpailuviranomaisen tutkima yhteistoimintajärjestely – Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja – 50 artikla – Ne bis in idem -periaate – Sama rikkominen – 52 artiklan 1 kohta – Ne bis in idem -periaatteen rajoitukset – Edellytykset – Yleisen edun mukaisen päämäärän tavoitteleminen – Oikeasuhteisuus.#Asia C-151/20.
judgment · FI · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Заключение на генералния адвокат M. Bobek, представено на 2 септември 2021 г.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde срещу Nordzucker AG и др.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Oberster Gerichtshof.#Преюдициално запитване — Конкуренция — Член 101 ДФЕС — Картел, преследван от два национални органи по конкуренция — Харта на основните права на Европейския съюз — Член 50 — Принцип ne bis in idem — Наличие на едно и също престъпление — Член 52, параграф 1 — Ограничения на принципа ne bis in idem — Условия — Преследване на цел от общ интерес — Пропорционалност.#Дело C-151/20.
judgment · BG · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Förslag till avgörande av generaladvokat M. Bobek föredraget den 2 september 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde mot Nordzucker AG m.fl.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Oberster Gerichtshof.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Konkurrens – Artikel 101 FEUF – Konkurrensbegränsande samverkan för vilken två nationella konkurrensmyndigheter inlett förfaranden – Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna – Artikel 50 – Principen ne bis in idem – En och samma överträdelse – Artikel 52.1 – Begränsningar av principen ne bis in idem – Villkor – Eftersträvande av ett mål av allmänintresse – Proportionalitet.#Mål C-151/20.
judgment · SV · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusões do advogado-geral M. Bobek apresentadas em 2 de setembro de 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde contra Nordzucker AG e o.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reenvio prejudicial — Concorrência — Artigo 101.° TFUE — Acordo objeto de procedimentos levados a cabo por duas autoridades nacionais de concorrência — Carta dos Direitos Fundamentais da União Europeia — Artigo 50.° — Princípio ne bis in idem — Existência de uma mesma infração — Artigo 52.°, n.° 1 — Restrições ao princípio ne bis in idem — Requisitos — Prossecução de um objetivo de interesse geral — Proporcionalidade.#Processo C-151/20.
judgment · PT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusie van advocaat-generaal M. Bobek van 2 september 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde tegen Nordzucker AG e.a.#Verzoek van het Oberste Gerichtshof om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Mededinging – Artikel 101 VWEU – Kartel dat door twee nationale mededingingsautoriteiten wordt vervolgd – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 50 – Beginsel ne bis in idem – Bestaan van een en hetzelfde strafbare feit – Artikel 52, lid 1 – Beperkingen die aan het beginsel ne bis in idem zijn gesteld – Voorwaarden – Nastreven van een doelstelling van algemeen belang – Evenredigheid.#Zaak C-151/20.
judgment · NL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Ģenerāladvokāta M. Bobeka [M. Bobek] secinājumi, 2021. gada 2. septembris.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde pret Nordzucker AG u.c.#Oberster Gerichtshof lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Konkurence – LESD 101. pants – Aizliegta vienošanās, pret kuru ir vērsušās divas valstu konkurences iestādes – Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību harta – 50. pants – Ne bis in idem princips – Viena un tā paša pārkāpuma esamība – 52. panta 1. punkts – Ne bis in idem principa ierobežojumi – Nosacījumi – Vispārējo interešu mērķa sasniegšana – Samērīgums.#Lieta C-151/20.
judgment · LV · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Generalinio advokato M. Bobek išvada, pateikta 2021 m. rugsėjo 2 d.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde prieš Nordzucker AG ir kt.#Oberster Gerichtshof prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Konkurencija – SESV 101 straipsnis – Dviejų nacionalinių konkurencijos institucijų tiriamas kartelis – Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartija – 50 straipsnis – Ne bis in idem principas – To paties pažeidimo buvimas – 52 straipsnio 1 dalis – Ne bis in idem principo apribojimai – Sąlygos – Bendrojo intereso tikslo siekimas – Proporcingumas.#Byla C-151/20.
judgment · LT · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
M. Bobek főtanácsnok indítványa, az ismertetés napja: 2021. szeptember 2.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde kontra Nordzucker AG és társai.#Az Oberster Gerichtshof (Németország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Verseny – EUMSZ 101. cikk – Két nemzeti versenyhatóság által üldözött kartell – Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartája – 50. cikk – A ne bis in idem elve – Ugyanazon jogsértés fennállása – Az 52. cikk (1) bekezdése – A ne bis in idem elvének korlátozásai – Feltételek – Közérdekű cél követése – Arányosság.#C-151/20. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika M. Bobeka od 2. rujna 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde protiv Nordzucker AG i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Oberster Gerichtshof.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Tržišno natjecanje – Članak 101. UFEU-a – Dva nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje koja progone zabranjeni sporazum – Povelja Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Članak 50. – Načelo ne bis in idem – Postojanje istog kažnjivog djela – Članak 52. stavak 1. – Ograničenja načela ne bis in idem – Uvjeti – Ostvarivanje cilja u općem interesu – Proporcionalnost.#Predmet C-151/20.
judgment · HR · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusions de l'avocat général M. M. Bobek, présentées le 2 septembre 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde contre Nordzucker AG e.a.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par l'Oberster Gerichtshof.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Concurrence – Article 101 TFUE – Entente poursuivie par deux autorités nationales de concurrence – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 50 – Principe ne bis in idem – Existence d’une même infraction – Article 52, paragraphe 1 – Limitations apportées au principe ne bis in idem – Conditions – Poursuite d’un objectif d’intérêt général – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-151/20.
judgment · FR · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Kohtujurist Bobeki ettepanek, 2.9.2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde versus Nordzucker AG jt.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Oberster Gerichtshof.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Konkurents – ELTL artikkel 101 – Kartellikokkulepe, mida menetlesid kaks riigisisest konkurentsiasutust – Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste harta – Artikkel 50 – Ne bis in idem’i põhimõte – Sama süüteo olemasolu – Artikli 52 lõige 1 – Ne bis in idem’i põhimõtte piiramine – Tingimused – Üldist huvi teeniva eesmärgi taotlemine – Proportsionaalsus.#Kohtuasi C-151/20.
judgment · ET · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Bobek, presentadas el 2 de septiembre de 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde contra Nordzucker AG y otros.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Oberster Gerichtshof.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Competencia — Artículo 101 TFUE — Práctica colusoria perseguida por dos autoridades nacionales de competencia — Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea — Artículo 50 — Principio non bis in idem — Existencia de la misma infracción — Artículo 52, apartado 1 — Limitaciones del principio non bis in idem — Requisitos — Persecución de un objetivo de interés general — Proporcionalidad.#Asunto C-151/20.
judgment · ES · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Προτάσεις του γενικού εισαγγελέα M. Bobek της 2ας Σεπτεμβρίου 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde κατά Nordzucker AG κ.λπ.#Αίτηση του Oberster Gerichtshof για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Ανταγωνισμός – Άρθρο 101 ΣΛΕΕ – Σύμπραξη κατά της οποίας ασκήθηκε δίωξη από δύο εθνικές αρχές ανταγωνισμού – Χάρτης των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης – Άρθρο 50 – Αρχή ne bis in idem – Ύπαρξη μίας και της αυτής παράβασης – Άρθρο 52, παράγραφος 1 – Περιορισμοί στην αρχή ne bis in idem – Προϋποθέσεις – Επιδίωξη σκοπού γενικού συμφέροντος – Αναλογικότητα.#Υπόθεση C-151/20.
judgment · EL · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts M. Bobek vom 2. September 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde gegen Nordzucker AG u. a.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Obersten Gerichtshofs.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Art. 101 AEUV – Von zwei nationalen Wettbewerbsbehörden verfolgtes Kartell – Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Art. 50 – Grundsatz ne bis in idem – Vorliegen derselben Straftat – Art. 52 Abs. 1 – Einschränkungen des Grundsatzes ne bis in idem – Voraussetzungen – Verfolgung einer dem Gemeinwohl dienenden Zielsetzung – Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-151/20.
judgment · DE · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Stanovisko generálního advokáta M. Bobka přednesené dne 2. září 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v. Nordzucker AG a další.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Oberster Gerichtshof.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Hospodářská soutěž – Článek 101 SFEU – Kartelová dohoda stíhaná dvěma vnitrostátními orgány pro hospodářskou soutěž – Listina základních práv Evropské unie – Článek 50 – Zásada ne bis in idem – Existence stejného protiprávního jednání – Článek 52 odst. 1 – Omezení zásady ne bis in idem – Podmínky – Sledování cíle obecného zájmu – Přiměřenost.#Věc C-151/20.
judgment · CS · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-151/20.
judgment · EN · 2 September 2021
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · 9944ba0b-c051-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1 · 9944ba0b-c051-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0151
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d19b7bb-0be2-11ec-adb1-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62020CC0151 · source updated 2 September 2021