PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

11088

Question 11088 — digital

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Damien Abad draws the attention of the Secretary of State, to the Prime Minister, responsible for digital affairs, to compliance with the GDPR, in force since May 2018. Indeed, the construction of very high-speed networks requires significant human resources and it appears that certain activities linked to intellectual services are carried out outside the European community. In addition, the creation of the AMII and AMEL zones carried out by private operators raises numerous issues concerning respect for the personal data of many users. It seems important to create these zones while ensuring compliance with the GDPR. In the absence of compliance with the regulation, users' computer data are sent outside the European Union to be subject to reprocessing which will then return to French soil without inform users. Therefore, the security of the personal data of French citizens must be increased. Furthermore, during the last State-region plan contract in 2015, the need for public investment in the FTHD plan to serve French companies was underlined. It is therefore abnormal that apart from the non-compliance with the GDPR which also applies in this case, the financing of the FTHD plan serves interests outside France. Also, he would like to know to what measures the Government plans to secure the processing of user data outside the European Union.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.