PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

11375

Question 11375 — people with disabilities

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Marine Le Pen draws the attention of the Secretary of State to the Prime Minister, responsible for people with disabilities, to certain abuses observed in the therapeutic treatment of autistic disorders in children. Playing on the despair of parents lacking solutions, some doctors offer - often at high prices, sometimes without protocol and without follow-up - alternative treatments which are at best ineffective (probiotics, diets), at worst harmful (ingestion of cannabis oil, chelation of heavy metals). Many parents also use, without necessarily being aware of the risks incurred by their child, products presented - on the Internet, social networks or during collective consultations - as active remedies against autism, even though they can be excessively dangerous for the body (chlorine dioxide, in particular). These products and practices have created a very lucrative market for its promoters which ignores any public health considerations. Since the children concerned are not intended to test the drugs and treatments on which the research groups are working, she questions them about the means she intends to implement in order to fight against these dangerous practices. She also asks him what devices she hears promote to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative treatments against autism that are being developed today.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.