PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

11790

Question 11790 — maternity health insurance

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 February 2018

Summary

Mr. Régis Juanico questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the implementation of the “zero-payment remainder” reform in optics. The signing on June 13 of a memorandum of understanding with two of the three unions in the optical sector concluded the consultation opened on January 23, 2018. Thus, on January 1, 2020, an offer without any outlay must be offered to patients by optical professionals. A a certain number of concerns remain, particularly with regard to geographical disparities, a possible limitation of the benefit of the device only to patients with a significant drop in visual acuity or even the price granted for lenses which would be insufficient to ensure quality services. For users of the health system, the question arises of financing this reform and the risk that it will come at a price an increase in contributions to supplementary health insurance and new reimbursements for medicines by health insurance. The choice of regulatory voice to establish this reform, and in particular the content of the care basket, to the detriment of parliamentary debate is particularly worrying. Also, he asks the Government's intentions regarding the organization of a real debate around this important reform within the framework of examination of the social security financing bill (PLFSS).

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.