PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

13728

Question 13728 — energy and fuels

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Aude Luquet draws the attention of the Minister of State, Minister for Ecological and Inclusive Transition, to concerns about the health risks of Linky and Gazpar meters which are the subject of radically contradictory information. 35 million electricity meters and 11 million gas meters must be replaced by 2021 and 2022 with new radio frequency meters allowing communication of the consumption in real time to the service provider. These meters have in fact been designed to avoid the physical intervention of a technician. Several mayors have issued orders to prevent the interruption of this type of meter among their citizens, while awaiting additional information. Indeed, the anti and pro Linky-Gazpar are engaged in a real media and legal battle without any real clear information whatsoever on the protection of personal data transmitted or even on the level of electromagnetic waves broadcast. In addition, many people fear a replacement cost passed on to consumers' bills. Thus, she asks him how the Government intends to give all the information and guarantees to consumers regarding the harmlessness of Linky-Gazpar meters in terms of diffusion of electromagnetic waves as well as protection of personal data. In addition, she asks him if the Government can guarantee that this system will not have any negative costs for the consumer.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.