Question 14241 — road safety

Summary

Mr. Michel Delpon draws the attention of the Minister, to the Minister of State, Minister for the ecological and inclusive transition, responsible for transport, to the implementation of the post-parking package (FPS) and its organizational and economic consequences which weigh on shared mobility operators. Whereas previously, rental companies had the possibility, in the event of a parking fine, to designate the tenant responsible, from now on, they must first pay the FPS payment and then turn against the tenant in order to recover the amount. Current legislation does not allow these operators to transfer, in the context of their activity, the responsibility for paying the FPS to the actual driver of the vehicle. Any clause introducing the automatic passing on of the FPS charge to the customer would be qualified as a clause abusive with regard to consumer rights. The financial consequences are significant and the amounts of the FPS are often much higher than that of the average daily profit from the short-term rental of a vehicle. On the other hand, it is important to emphasize that shared mobility players represent an alternative to vehicle ownership and contribute to the renewal of the vehicle fleet, rental fleets are made up of recent vehicles renewed on average every 6 months. Also, he asks him if the mobility orientation bill provides for the establishment of a mechanism for designating the client of the shared mobility operator.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.