France · Question · Question écrite
14396
Question 14396 — people with disabilities
Introduced
—
Last action
—
Status
posée
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
—
Summary
Ms. Danièle Obono questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health about the difficulty for families of children with specific language and learning disorders to obtain the disability compensation measures to which they would be entitled. For families of children with specific language and learning disorders, obtaining the “Personalized Schooling Project” (PPS) is very difficult even if the medical part and the life plan highlight the needs for compensation in all areas of their child's life. Some departmental centers for disabled people (MDPH) even recommend a Personalized Support Plan (PAP) as part of a PPS, which is contrary to the law. Despite the guide from the National Solidarity and Autonomy Fund to harmonize the responses of MDPHs, they depend too much on the representation of these disorders by professionals in multidisciplinary evaluation teams. Some MDPHs massively reject families' requests on the pretext that a specific language and learning disorder would not cause a handicap situation requiring compensation in the educational and financial fields (educational allowance for disabled children) to finance psychomotor skills or occupational therapy (in liberal or medico-social), and therefore refer to the PAP. Families must demonstrate each year that their child is truly “disabled” and request further assessments to justify their requests, whereas obtaining a PPS for one cycle would help relieve congestion on the MDPH. There is a shortage of many places in Special Education and Home Care Services (SESSAD), which causes waiting times of several years and SESSADs on specific language and learning disorders (TSLA) are very insufficient in number. TSLA Local School Inclusion Units (ULIS) do not exist in the majority of departments. Young adults have great difficulty in having the additional cost of obtaining a driving license covered due to their disability (disability compensation benefit, PCH). Finally, the influx of files to the MDPH causes the CDAPH to open files less and less, which distorts the spirit of the law of February 11, 2005. Faced with these different situations, it asks it what measures it intends to take to ensure that the means of compensation for the disability really correspond to the needs of the children and adults concerned.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/questions/QANR5L15QE14396
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L15QE14396