France · Question · Question écrite
15591
Question 15591 — road safety
Introduced
—
Last action
—
Status
répondue
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 April 2019
Summary
Mr. Didier Le Gac draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to compensation for bodily injury due to a traffic accident. According to the “Justice for Road Victims” collective, it seems that the use of triplicate in police stations and gendarmes, abandoned with the exception of 3 departments, is detrimental to these victims. Indeed, in the event of a bodily accident resulting in injury or death, it There is no report drawn up between the parties, only the “Accident report” is authentic to determine the responsibilities towards the insurer. In the absence of a report, whatever the circumstances of the accident, the fate of the families finds themselves suspended in an investigation procedure which can be very long and which insurance companies often misuse in order to postpone the payment of provisions. To avoid these abuses which plunge too many families in very critical financial situations, he would like to question him on the advisability of re-establishing the triplicate in which the initial findings of the accident would be recorded, the complete civil status of all the people involved in the accident, the information relating to the validity or not of the driving licenses of all the drivers involved in these same accidents, the names and vehicle insurance contract numbers also involved. These triplicates would be given to the families or victims or to a specialized association having received a mandate within five days following the accident. It should be noted that, according to what was reported to the “Justice for Road Victims” collective by the police, the issuance of such a type of document would not increase their workload and would avoid the requests and reminders from the victims and their families to which they are subject while awaiting the results of the investigation and the drafting of the “Accident report”.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/questions/QANR5L15QE15591
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L15QE15591