Question 15790 — civil servants and public agents

Summary

Mr. Julien Limongi draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the consequences of the reform of complementary social protection (PSC) implemented for national education personnel. This reform, presented as an important step forward for the social protection of public employees, nevertheless raises many questions among the staff concerned. Many teachers report an increase of their remaining dependents or a deterioration in the financial balance of their family health coverage, without any improvement that they consider significant in the guarantees they benefit from. Several testimonies thus point out situations in which the financial participation of the employer does not fully compensate for the evolution of contributions or the modification of the guarantees previously subscribed. These questions concern particularly certain family configurations, notably couples of civil servants, families with children or even future retired agents concerned about the continuity of their coverage. Furthermore, various comparative analyzes published in recent months suggest that certain guarantees of the contract adopted for national education personnel could appear less favorable than those put in place in other state civil service ministries. These elements deserve to be objectivized by official data. In this context, he asks how many agents reporting to the Ministry of National Education are, according to the Government's estimates, financially winners, neutral or losers due to the reform of complementary social protection (PSC), as well as the distribution of these effects according to the main family and professional situations of agents. He would also like to know the average gain or loss observed for each of these categories, as well as the comparisons made between the contract chosen for national education personnel and those implemented in other state civil service ministries. Finally, he questions him on the measures that the Government is considering in order to guarantee that this reform does not not lead, for a significant proportion of staff, to a reduction in their purchasing power or a deterioration in their level of social protection. He also asks whether a prior impact study has been carried out in order to assess the financial consequences of this reform for the different categories of national education staff. If so, he would like to know if this study can be made public and know its main conclusions, particularly with regard to the distribution of gains and losses according to the family and professional situations of the agents. If not, he asks what statistical, actuarial or economic elements the Government relied on to assert that this reform constitutes an overall improvement in the complementary social protection of the personnel concerned.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.