France · Question · Question écrite
17076
Question 17076 — unemployment
Introduced
21 July 2026
Last action
—
Status
posée
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
21 July 2026
Summary
Mr. Alexandre Allegret-Pilot draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the compensation rules applicable to policyholders who, following a substantial and lasting reduction in their earned income, wish to mobilize their rights to unemployment insurance as additional income. Many contributors who maintain or return to an activity that is less remunerative than the previous one come up against a system that does not does not allow them to activate such a supplement, even though they have contributed. This situation raises two difficulties. On the one hand, when a supplement can theoretically be mobilized, the insured is forced to subsequently reconstitute rights which should be better calibrated, in order to achieve a neutral operation for the finances of unemployment insurance. On the other hand, and above all, the current system does not provide an incentive for recovery of activity: an insured person whose income may remain, for several months, lower than that which he received previously, may be led to refuse contracts, contrary to the objective of returning to employment. This results in situations in which people in good faith, actively seeking contracts, find themselves permanently below the SMIC without being able to benefit from a supplement, due to the lack of a system adapted to reductions in income linked to the evolution of their activity or their family situation. Consequently, he asks whether the Government intends to change the rules of unemployment insurance in order to allow contributors to mobilize their rights as additional income in the event of a substantial drop in these, according to methods that are neutral for the balance of the system, and to guarantee that the system encourages, rather than discourages, recovery. or the conservation of an activity.
Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/questions/QANR5L17QE17076
- Open data entity: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/QANR5L17QE17076