PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17141

Question 17141 — professions and social activities

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Patrick Vignal alerts the Minister of Labor about the modification of the amount of the criteria for granting Return to Employment Assistance (ARE) envisaged by the Government and its repercussions for childminders. Such changes to the operation of the ARE will have consequences for these early childhood workers and will result in a direct monthly loss of income of 30 to 300 euros. However, in France, Childminders, whose status as employees was recognized and defined by the law of June 27, 2005, constitute the most requested method of childcare. These early childhood workers are faced with numerous hazards due to the multiplicity of their simultaneous employers. As such, if one of the employers changes their situation, the notice periods to which childminders are subject are extremely short, from fifteen days when the contract is less than a year old and one month when the contract is more than a year old. A change in the amount and criteria for granting the ARE would then directly impact childminders, their income and their working conditions, which are often already difficult given their missions. Thus, he would like to know if the specificity of the job of childminder, and the undeniable precariousness attached to it, will be taken into account in the context of the modification of assistance for returning to work.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.