PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17247

Question 17247 — gender equality and parity

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Ms. Céline Calvez questions the Secretary of State to the Minister of the Economy and Finance and the Minister of Action and Public Accounts, responsible for digital technology, on the issue of promoting gender equality in student guidance. On May 31, 2018, the MP and the MP Stéphane Viry submitted a report on the place of women in the scientific field entitled “Women and science: urgent action for real equality. This work has shown that women still occupy too little a place in the so-called “hard” sciences and that despite certain advances, the situation is only evolving very slowly, and sometimes even shows a certain decline. This imbalance is found from the choice of options at the end of school and into professional life. 23 recommendations are made in this report. The ninth of them is to experiment with digital training with young girls engaged in service specialties within the professional and technological path. The choice of students' orientations appears to be very clearly linked to gender and the qualities that we attribute to girls and boys respectively. It is essential to compensate for these preconceived ideas. This is why she asks him if such training experiments digital technologies are or will be implemented for girls engaged in service specialties within the professional and technological path.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.