PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

17425

Question 17425 — value added tax

answeredFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

répondue

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

3 February 2019

Summary

Mr. Éric Pauget draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the possibility for bare owners to transfer to the usufructuary the VAT charged on their acquisition. The instruction published in BOI-TVA-IMM-10-30 No. 190 and 200 specifies that when bare ownership constitutes a fixed asset for its owner as well as usufruct for its beneficiary, the bare owner can transfer the right to deduction of which it is deprived for the benefit of the usufructuary, since the latter uses the property for operations giving right to deduction. Taken literally, the above-mentioned doctrine seems to only authorize the transfer of the right to deduction if the bare owner has himself carried out the dismemberment, transferred the usufruct to a third party and retained bare ownership. However, it seems logical to ensure an identical VAT transfer regime when the dismemberment of property is carried out by the developer who sells the building. Therefore, he asks him to confirm that the bare owner can transfer to the usufructuary the VAT having burdened the acquisition of the bare ownership even in the hypothesis where the dismemberment of ownership is carried out from the outset by the construction-sale company which constructed the building.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.