PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

20709

Question 20709 — unemployment

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Christophe Jerretie draws the attention of the Minister of Labor to the decrees implementing the opening of the right to unemployment insurance for those who have resigned. This campaign promise from the President of the Republic had a clear objective: to make it easier for everyone to choose their professional future. In order to follow through on this flagship commitment, the law of September 5, 2018 was adopted for the freedom to choose one's future. professional. More particularly, it is article 50 of the latter which opens this right to unemployment insurance for those who have resigned, subject to satisfying certain conditions. Negotiations between social partners having failed to reach an agreement on the reform of unemployment insurance, the Government is committed to taking its responsibilities to meet two objectives: fighting against precariousness and encouraging return to employment. But today the incomprehension of many citizens reigns. In fact, many resigned thinking they could take advantage of this measure adopted nine months ago, and therefore benefit from the return to work allowance (ARE). However, to date, these provisions have proven to be ineffective. Therefore, faced with this situation, he would like to know the timetable for the application of article 50 opening the regime unemployment insurance for those who have resigned.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.