PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

2366

Question 2366 — social security

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mr. Raphaël Schellenberger questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health on the non-compensation of tax exemptions on low wages which threatens the proper functioning of the agricultural accident insurance funds (CAAA) of the departments of Bas-Rhin, Haut-Rhin and Moselle. These social security organizations, created in 1889, are responsible for covering work accidents and occupational diseases (AT/MP) for nationals agricultural and para-agricultural employees and non-employees of these three departments. However, unlike previous exemptions from employer contributions on low salaries, the exemption system put in place in 2015 has still not been compensated by a procedure for reimbursement of these exemptions. If it is admissible that the principle of financial compensation for transfers of charges between the State and social security be traditionally implemented in a global manner, it is however appropriate, in the present case, to examine the particular situation relating to the social security system under local law of which the CAAAs of Bas-Rhin, Haut-Rhin and Moselle are part since these funds only deal with the AT/MP branch, no equalization is possible between the different branches. He therefore questions him about the measures envisaged to compensate contribution exemptions for low salaries and thus allow these funds to pursue their mission.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.