PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Question · Question écrite

25508

Question 25508 — pharmacy and medications

openFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

Last action

Status

posée

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

Summary

Mrs. Perrine Goulet draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the difficulties that pharmaceutical pharmacies encounter with regard to the compulsory recruitment of the number of assistants that pharmacists must have based on their turnover excluding tax. Indeed, since the resumption of the delivery of medicines in place of hospitals, pharmacists have suffered an increase in the number business without increasing profits. Consequently, pharmacists find themselves obliged to recruit. The MP recommends reassessing the scale of the number of assistants with a change in the levels of turnover excluding tax as follows: currently the turnover of 1.3 million euros could be reassessed to 2.6 million euros for the recruitment of an additional assistant. For a second deputy the turnover currently of 2.6 million euros could be reassessed to 3.9 million euros and for any additional deputy the turnover threshold of 3.9 million euros would be reassessed to 5.2 million euros. These new measures would not only make it possible to absorb an “artificial” increase in turnover but would also allow pharmacy owners to receive assistance to a fair extent. their activity. She asks him if this proposal can be the subject of a rewriting of the decree of May 15, 2011 relating to the number of pharmacists in pharmacies.

Machine translation from French. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.